In looking for a baseline for the change set
history, I tried to see how early an image I could still run. That
ended up being 2.5 with one small glitch noticed. I simply could
not get earlier images to run well or at all. The Mac has gone
through several processor/os changes since the early squeak days
and this complicates things. So,
- what's the earliest squeak image you can still run on your everyday computer? - is there a way to run earlier than 2.5 on a modern Mac? Cheers, Bob |
Bob,
in this Ubuntu 12.04 machine I can run Squeak 2.2 with its respective VM. Earlier than that doesn't work because it needs libc.so.5 (and, in some cases, libm.so.5 as well). Using a 4.0 VM I can run Squeak 1.16, which is the oldest that I have. I also have the 1.1 re-release with the APSL license, but that doesn't include the VM and the image gives me a blank window the the 4.0 VM and a segmentation fault with a 2.2 VM. -- Jecel |
In reply to this post by Bob Arning-2
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Arning > Sent: 10/02/13 05:56 AM > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Subject: [squeak-dev] running old images > > In looking for a baseline for the change set history, I tried to see how > early an image I could still run. That ended up being 2.5 with one small > glitch noticed. I simply could not get earlier images to run well or at > all. The Mac has gone through several processor/os changes since the > early squeak days and this complicates things. So, > > - what's the earliest squeak image you can still run on your everyday > computer? > - is there a way to run earlier than 2.5 on a modern Mac? > > Cheers, > Bob I have a vague recollection of playing with vmac years ago. This project is its successor. http://minivmac.sourceforge.net/doc/about.html I don't have time to test it out right now, but it does look promising. jrm |
In reply to this post by Bob Arning-2
On 10/2/13 9:56 AM, "Bob Arning" <[hidden email]> wrote: In looking for a baseline for the change set history, I tried to see how early an image I could still run. That ended up being 2.5 with one small glitch noticed. I simply could not get earlier images to run well or at all. The Mac has gone through several processor/os changes since the early squeak days and this complicates things. So, The mini image of Dan Ingalls is 2.2 based and run well on Mac with Squeak 4.2.5beta1U VM of John Edgar |
In reply to this post by Bob Arning-2
Hi Bob,
I just tried Squeak 1.1, 1.31, 2.0, 2.1 and 2.5 in my Windows 7 32 bit machine. All of them run perfectly fine with an appropriate VM (from about the time the image was released). I think any Squeak ever released should run in Windows. I usually don't advocate any platform, and for everyday I prefer my Mac, but WRT compatibility with old stuff, Windows really rocks. You can install VirtualBox and Windows XP or 7 in your Mac. It should run all the old images without problems. Quoting Bob Arning <[hidden email]>:
Cheers, |
On 02-10-2013, at 4:15 PM, "J. Vuletich (mail lists)" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > I just tried Squeak 1.1, 1.31, 2.0, 2.1 and 2.5 in my Windows 7 32 bit machine. All of them run perfectly fine with an appropriate VM (from about the time the image was released). I think any Squeak ever released should run in Windows. > I usually don't advocate any platform, and for everyday I prefer my Mac, but WRT compatibility with old stuff, Windows really rocks. You can install VirtualBox and Windows XP or 7 in your Mac. It should run all the old images without problems. Or you could get a Raspberry Pi, load up RISC OS and run pretty much any VM/image era pairing. And without having to suffer Windows! How can that not be worth ~$40 ? tim -- tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Strange OpCodes: PRM: PRint Money |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |