Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

source.squeak.org blocked again

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

Nicolas Cellier

source.squeak.org blocked again

Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each commit, but
last one took a few hours...

Nicolas

Bert Freudenberg

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

On 09.11.2009, at 00:55, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

> Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
> I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each commit, but
> last one took a few hours...

Solved by a mouse wiggle :/

- Bert -

Julian Fitzell-2

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

Umm... wow. :)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On 09.11.2009, at 00:55, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>
>> Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
>> I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each commit, but
>> last one took a few hours...
>
> Solved by a mouse wiggle :/
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>

Nicolas Cellier

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

Let's see the good side: it provides a kind of filter to avoid too
many [trunk] spams on this list

2009/11/9 Julian Fitzell <[hidden email]>:

> Umm... wow. :)
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On 09.11.2009, at 00:55, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
>>> I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each commit, but
>>> last one took a few hours...
>>
>> Solved by a mouse wiggle :/
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

johnmci

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

In reply to this post by Julian Fitzell-2

Well assuming it's bug
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581

any chance someone in charge can update the image that supports source.squeak.org
?

On 2009-11-09, at 10:04 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> Umm... wow. :)
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Bert Freudenberg
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On 09.11.2009, at 00:55, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
>>> I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each commit,
>>> but
>>> last one took a few hours...
>>
>> Solved by a mouse wiggle :/
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
=
=
=
========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Twitter:
squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
=
=
=
========================================================================

Bert Freudenberg

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

Thanks, I applied that to the server image and enabled serverMode. I'm
not sure the Delay fixes are in though - Ken?

OTOH, don't the outages bother anyone enough to move the source server
to a trunk image and new vm?

- Bert -

On 09.11.2009, at 20:33, John M McIntosh wrote:

> Well assuming it's bug
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581
>
> any chance someone in charge can update the image that supports source.squeak.org
> ?
>
>
> On 2009-11-09, at 10:04 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:
>
>> Umm... wow. :)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.11.2009, at 00:55, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, i blocked source.squeak.org again...
>>>> I just commited a Kernel.mcz ... It does not block at each
>>>> commit, but
>>>> last one took a few hours...
>>>
>>> Solved by a mouse wiggle :/
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Twitter:
> squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://
> www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
>
>

Ken Causey-3

Re: source.squeak.org blocked again

On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 00:13 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Thanks, I applied that to the server image and enabled serverMode. I'm
> not sure the Delay fixes are in though - Ken?

I doubt it, I don't remember applying anything relevant at least
(relying on my memory is problematic however).

> OTOH, don't the outages bother anyone enough to move the source server
> to a trunk image and new vm?
>
> - Bert -

Yes, I'm hoping the itch will have built up sufficiently very soon.

Ken

signature.asc (197 bytes) Download Attachment