source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

source.squeak.org down [EOM]

fniephaus



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Chris Muller-3
Just saw this and checked, it's up.  Nothing in the logs, however,
daemontools says its only been up for 9200 seconds, which corresponds
to the time of your mail.  Very strange..  Not sure if someone shut it
down or something else..

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

fniephaus

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
Just saw this and checked, it's up.  Nothing in the logs, however,
daemontools says its only been up for 9200 seconds, which corresponds
to the time of your mail.  Very strange..  Not sure if someone shut it
down or something else..

Tobias apparently logged into the machine and saw the process hanging at 100% CPU. He decided to kill it after a few minutes and then it must have restarted automatically.
But thanks for looking into this.
 

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Chris Muller-3
Whoa, please don't kill the process!  It isn't hung, its building the
historical index.  It will be using 100% CPU for the next few weeks.
Performance will be slightly degraded until then but the system should
be accessible.  Thanks for your patience, it will be worth it -- at
the end we'll finally have a permanently integrated MC history for
every method and class definition.


On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Just saw this and checked, it's up.  Nothing in the logs, however,
>> daemontools says its only been up for 9200 seconds, which corresponds
>> to the time of your mail.  Very strange..  Not sure if someone shut it
>> down or something else..
>
>
> Tobias apparently logged into the machine and saw the process hanging at
> 100% CPU. He decided to kill it after a few minutes and then it must have
> restarted automatically.
> But thanks for looking into this.
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Tobias Pape

On 26.10.2016, at 19:08, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Whoa, please don't kill the process!

mkay.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Tobias Pape
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3

On 26.10.2016, at 19:08, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Whoa, please don't kill the process!  It isn't hung, its building the
> historical index.  It will be using 100% CPU for the next few weeks.
> Performance will be slightly degraded until then but the system should
> be accessible.  Thanks for your patience, it will be worth it -- at
> the end we'll finally have a permanently integrated MC history for
> every method and class definition.
>
>

please note that the machine(s) need a restart very soon to upgrade its kernel
(viz. patch a recent severe security hole)

Best regards
        -Tobias

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just saw this and checked, it's up.  Nothing in the logs, however,
>>> daemontools says its only been up for 9200 seconds, which corresponds
>>> to the time of your mail.  Very strange..  Not sure if someone shut it
>>> down or something else..
>>
>>
>> Tobias apparently logged into the machine and saw the process hanging at
>> 100% CPU. He decided to kill it after a few minutes and then it must have
>> restarted automatically.
>> But thanks for looking into this.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: source.squeak.org down [EOM]

Chris Muller-4
Okay, it shoudn't be a problem, thanks for the note.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On 26.10.2016, at 19:08, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Whoa, please don't kill the process!  It isn't hung, its building the
>> historical index.  It will be using 100% CPU for the next few weeks.
>> Performance will be slightly degraded until then but the system should
>> be accessible.  Thanks for your patience, it will be worth it -- at
>> the end we'll finally have a permanently integrated MC history for
>> every method and class definition.
>>
>>
>
> please note that the machine(s) need a restart very soon to upgrade its kernel
> (viz. patch a recent severe security hole)
>
> Best regards
>         -Tobias
>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just saw this and checked, it's up.  Nothing in the logs, however,
>>>> daemontools says its only been up for 9200 seconds, which corresponds
>>>> to the time of your mail.  Very strange..  Not sure if someone shut it
>>>> down or something else..
>>>
>>>
>>> Tobias apparently logged into the machine and saw the process hanging at
>>> 100% CPU. He decided to kill it after a few minutes and then it must have
>>> restarted automatically.
>>> But thanks for looking into this.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>