I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha.
However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). Richard Snow -- http://mypals.info |
richard snow wrote:
> I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). Try building the standard unix VM for x86_64. Recent and vast improvements in the VM and vmmaker should make that a workable solution. Much much more work is still required to make it SMP enabled. =( -- New president: Here we go again... Chemistry.com: A total rip-off. Powers are not rights. |
In reply to this post by richardsnow
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote:
> I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). Hi, I expect that you built this with the "64 bit vm?" button enabled on the VMMaker tool, right? If so, then you are the victim of some confusing labeling on that screen. What you've got right now is a 64 bit VM that is capable of running (only) 64 bit images. What you want is a 64 bit VM that is capable of running (only) 32 bit images. Try unchecking the "64 bit vm?" option and generate the sources that way. You should end up with a 64 bit VM with will work with a normal 32 bit image. Dave |
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gzOn Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: But it's (IIRC) unsupported and probably unstable. 32-bit images are better supported and the garbage collector isn't really designed for images bigger than 4GB. Gulik. -- http://gulik.pbwiki.com/ |
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
ok -- I have built a 3.8 64 bit Vm that works with the 64 bit image...
I may now try to do the 64 bit generation for the 32 bit image as you said. It is a little confusing yes. On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, David T. Lewis<[hidden email]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: >> I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. >> However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind >> of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). > > Hi, > > I expect that you built this with the "64 bit vm?" button enabled > on the VMMaker tool, right? If so, then you are the victim of some > confusing labeling on that screen. What you've got right now is > a 64 bit VM that is capable of running (only) 64 bit images. What > you want is a 64 bit VM that is capable of running (only) 32 bit > images. > > Try unchecking the "64 bit vm?" option and generate the sources > that way. You should end up with a 64 bit VM with will work with > a normal 32 bit image. > > Dave > > > -- http://mypals.info |
In reply to this post by Michael van der Gulik-2
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:40:38AM +1200, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: > > > I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. > > > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind > > > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). > > > > I'm guessing that this would be a 64-bit image: > > http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/ > Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz<http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz> > > But it's (IIRC) unsupported and probably unstable. 32-bit images are better > supported and the garbage collector isn't really designed for images bigger > than 4GB. There's nothing unstable about that image, but unfortunately it does not run on today's VMs (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5239). Personally I use a descendent of that original 64-bit image (mainly for testing VMs) but as far as I know nobody is actively working on this. In any case, it's of acedemic interest in this case, because what Richard needs is a 64-bit VM to run normal 32-bit images. Dave |
http://mypals.info/tikiwiki-2.1/tiki-index.php?page=SqueakForAlpha
Here is a page with the two vms I've made (source code). the 3.8 is a 64 bit that runs 64 bit images, the 3.10 is a 64 bit that runs 32 bit images. On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David T. Lewis<[hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:40:38AM +1200, Michael van der Gulik wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: >> > > I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. >> > > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind >> > > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). >> > >> >> I'm guessing that this would be a 64-bit image: >> >> http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/ >> Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz<http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz> >> >> But it's (IIRC) unsupported and probably unstable. 32-bit images are better >> supported and the garbage collector isn't really designed for images bigger >> than 4GB. > > There's nothing unstable about that image, but unfortunately it does not run > on today's VMs (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5239). Personally I use a > descendent of that original 64-bit image (mainly for testing VMs) but as far > as I know nobody is actively working on this. > > In any case, it's of acedemic interest in this case, because what Richard needs > is a 64-bit VM to run normal 32-bit images. > > Dave > > > -- http://mypals.info |
Richard,
Very nice. Thanks for the link to http://mypals.info/tikiwiki-2.1/tiki-index.php?page=SqueakForAlpha. I am CCing this to the vm-dev mailing list, where various interested parties (including Ian) are likely to be reading. Dave On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:39:01PM -0500, richard snow wrote: > http://mypals.info/tikiwiki-2.1/tiki-index.php?page=SqueakForAlpha > > Here is a page with the two vms I've made (source code). > > the 3.8 is a 64 bit that runs 64 bit images, the 3.10 is a 64 bit that > runs 32 bit images. > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David T. Lewis<[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:40:38AM +1200, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: > >> > > I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. > >> > > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind > >> > > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). > >> > > >> > >> I'm guessing that this would be a 64-bit image: > >> > >> http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/ > >> Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz<http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz> > >> > >> But it's (IIRC) unsupported and probably unstable. 32-bit images are better > >> supported and the garbage collector isn't really designed for images bigger > >> than 4GB. > > > > There's nothing unstable about that image, but unfortunately it does not run > > on today's VMs (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5239). Personally I use a > > descendent of that original 64-bit image (mainly for testing VMs) but as far > > as I know nobody is actively working on this. > > > > In any case, it's of acedemic interest in this case, because what Richard needs > > is a 64-bit VM to run normal 32-bit images. > > > > Dave > > |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:17 PM, David T. Lewis<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Richard, > > Very nice. Thanks for the link to http://mypals.info/tikiwiki-2.1/tiki-index.php?page=SqueakForAlpha. > > I am CCing this to the vm-dev mailing list, where various interested > parties (including Ian) are likely to be reading. > > Dave > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:39:01PM -0500, richard snow wrote: >> http://mypals.info/tikiwiki-2.1/tiki-index.php?page=SqueakForAlpha >> >> Here is a page with the two vms I've made (source code). >> >> the 3.8 is a 64 bit that runs 64 bit images, the 3.10 is a 64 bit that >> runs 32 bit images. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David T. Lewis<[hidden email]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:40:38AM +1200, Michael van der Gulik wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:16:02PM -0500, richard snow wrote: >> >> > > I was able to use vmmaker to generate a 64 bit vm for the Alpha. >> >> > > However it can't run 32 bit images, so I'm kind >> >> > > of stuck. Where could I get an image (3.10-6 hopefully). >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm guessing that this would be a 64-bit image: >> >> >> >> http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/ >> >> Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz<http://squeakvm.org/squeak64/dist3/Squeak64-3.8g-6548.image.tar.gz> >> >> >> >> But it's (IIRC) unsupported and probably unstable. 32-bit images are better >> >> supported and the garbage collector isn't really designed for images bigger >> >> than 4GB. >> > >> > There's nothing unstable about that image, but unfortunately it does not run >> > on today's VMs (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5239). Personally I use a >> > descendent of that original 64-bit image (mainly for testing VMs) but as far >> > as I know nobody is actively working on this. >> > >> > In any case, it's of acedemic interest in this case, because what Richard needs >> > is a 64-bit VM to run normal 32-bit images. >> > >> > Dave >> > > > -- http://mypals.info Ian says he committed some changes to the trunk to enable the build for alpha. The config scripts no longer need changing, but there are still references to sa_restore member of sigact structure. When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages in the attached file over and over again and the make never seems to finish. Richard Snow error.txt (862 bytes) Download Attachment |
On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote:
> When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages in > the attached file over and over again > and the make never seems to finish. I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken behaviour on i686. I'm investigating now. I can't help thinking (again) that getting rid of libtool (and maybe even autoconf) altogether would make life so much simpler... Cheers, Ian |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ian Piumarta <[hidden email]> wrote: On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote: +10!!
|
In reply to this post by Ian Piumarta-2
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Ian Piumarta<[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote: > >> When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages in >> the attached file over and over again >> and the make never seems to finish. > > I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken > behaviour on i686. I'm investigating now. I can't help thinking (again) > that getting rid of libtool (and maybe even autoconf) altogether would make > life so much simpler... > > Cheers, > Ian > > > So I'm not completlely crazy even if I am schizophrenic lol. (i'm a disabled Navy vet. I had a head injury in 1981 that left me hospitalized and got a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. -- http://mypals.info |
On Aug 4, 2009, at 9:17 PM, richard snow wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Ian Piumarta<[hidden email]> > wrote: >> On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote: >> >>> When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error >>> messages in >>> the attached file over and over again >>> and the make never seems to finish. >> >> I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken >> behaviour on i686. I'm investigating now. The culprit was libtool 2.2. Reverting autoconf 2.63 back to 2.50 or 2.13 did not help at all, but rebuilding 'configure' on Mac OS 10.4 with libtool 1.4 resulted in a working script. I committed that to the trunk, which will now build (on Linux/alpha too) but woe betide anyone who tries to rebuild configure on a recent OS! This is clearly an untenable situation. My displacement activity for the rest of this week may well be the eradication of libtool from the build system. Many thanks to Richard for providing me with access to his DEC Alpha. I've made a Linux/Alpha binary available at squeakvm.org. Cheers, Ian |
On 05.08.2009, at 08:40, Ian Piumarta wrote:
> My displacement activity for the rest of this week may well be the > eradication of libtool from the build system. This doesn't sound like *real* fun ;) Maybe another displacement would be getting sound to work again. See http://tracker.squeakland.org/browse/SQ-214 Both Fedora and Ubuntu now run PulseAudio by default, which virtualizes our ALSA calls, but incompletely. Here's the PulseAudio author's summary of the state of affairs (if you're into flame wars, read the comments): http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/guide-to-sound-apis.html He has some advice in there for how to get low-latency sound output. - Bert - |
On Aug 5, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Maybe another displacement would be getting sound to work again. > Both Fedora and Ubuntu now run PulseAudio by default I think the Scratch people are working on a native pulse audio driver. It'll be in the repo as soon as I have a copy. Cheers, Ian |
In reply to this post by Ian Piumarta-2
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Ian Piumarta <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote: > >> When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages in >> the attached file over and over again >> and the make never seems to finish. > > I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken Hi Ian. I've gone out of state on a short trip. I've got a new girlfriend. We are talking marriage. I downloaded the ST80 Blue book. See ya |
On 25.09.2009, at 10:05, richard snow wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Ian Piumarta <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote: >> >>> When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages >>> in >>> the attached file over and over again >>> and the make never seems to finish. >> >> I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken > > Hi Ian. I've gone out of state on a short trip. I've got a new > girlfriend. We are talking > marriage. Congrats! > I downloaded the ST80 Blue book. > > See ya Great too! :) Anybody for reconsidering the reply-to munging on this list? - Bert - |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please! Its much easier to repost again to the right address than it is to retract a private message ;) But *why* can't mailers make more of a fuss about reply/reply-all? This kind of mistake is incredibly easy to make.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |