[squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or 3.10?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or 3.10?

Danie Roux-3
Dear list,

I've been trying to get Monticello Configurations to work, ideally in
a 3.9 based image. I would be very interested to hear from anyone
using it successfully in a 3.9 or 3.10 image.

I take these steps:

- Start with a new Squeak3.9.1-final-7075 image.
- Open up a Monticello Configurations from the menu
- Add Balloon-ar.13
- Add repository http://source.squeakfoundation.org/Balloon from the list

I can now hit update (from repositories), and get Balloon-ar.14. Cool,
as expected.

- I click Store, and save it as test.mcm in my local package-cache repository.
- I now close everything and open a Monticello Browser again.
- I open my package-cache repository
- Select "test" project
- Select test.mcm on the right pane and I get a walkback:

"My subclass should have overridden #loadVersionInfo"

--
Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

Ron Teitelbaum
Hi Diane,

There are a few different fixes out there, if you check this list I believe
Philippe once posted a list of all the different fixes.

Here is mine:
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5217 

In my opinion Monticello Configurations are essential, although I have
experienced some trouble with competing versions in different repositories.


Good luck,

Ron Teitelbaum

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Danie Roux
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:41 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9
> or3.10?
>
> Dear list,
>
> I've been trying to get Monticello Configurations to work, ideally in
> a 3.9 based image. I would be very interested to hear from anyone
> using it successfully in a 3.9 or 3.10 image.
>
> I take these steps:
>
> - Start with a new Squeak3.9.1-final-7075 image.
> - Open up a Monticello Configurations from the menu
> - Add Balloon-ar.13
> - Add repository http://source.squeakfoundation.org/Balloon from the list
>
> I can now hit update (from repositories), and get Balloon-ar.14. Cool,
> as expected.
>
> - I click Store, and save it as test.mcm in my local package-cache
> repository.
> - I now close everything and open a Monticello Browser again.
> - I open my package-cache repository
> - Select "test" project
> - Select test.mcm on the right pane and I get a walkback:
>
> "My subclass should have overridden #loadVersionInfo"
>
> --
> Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or 3.10?

keith1y
In reply to this post by Danie Roux-3
see

http://installer.pbwiki.com/LevelPlayingField

Keith

p.s. if it doesnt work let us know and we will fix it.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

stephane ducasse
In reply to this post by Ron Teitelbaum
do the configurations manage different servers ?
do the configurations manage different servers on a per package level?

Stef

On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:

> Hi Diane,
>
> There are a few different fixes out there, if you check this list I  
> believe
> Philippe once posted a list of all the different fixes.
>
> Here is mine:
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5217
>
> In my opinion Monticello Configurations are essential, although I have
> experienced some trouble with competing versions in different  
> repositories.
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev-
>> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Danie Roux
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:41 AM
>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>> Subject: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in  
>> 3.9
>> or3.10?
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I've been trying to get Monticello Configurations to work, ideally in
>> a 3.9 based image. I would be very interested to hear from anyone
>> using it successfully in a 3.9 or 3.10 image.
>>
>> I take these steps:
>>
>> - Start with a new Squeak3.9.1-final-7075 image.
>> - Open up a Monticello Configurations from the menu
>> - Add Balloon-ar.13
>> - Add repository http://source.squeakfoundation.org/Balloon from  
>> the list
>>
>> I can now hit update (from repositories), and get Balloon-ar.14.  
>> Cool,
>> as expected.
>>
>> - I click Store, and save it as test.mcm in my local package-cache
>> repository.
>> - I now close everything and open a Monticello Browser again.
>> - I open my package-cache repository
>> - Select "test" project
>> - Select test.mcm on the right pane and I get a walkback:
>>
>> "My subclass should have overridden #loadVersionInfo"
>>
>> --
>> Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com
>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

Bert Freudenberg
Am 27.06.2008 um 08:51 schrieb stephane ducasse:

> do the configurations manage different servers ?

Yes.

> do the configurations manage different servers on a per package level?

Not currently. If you give more than one repository, the package is  
searched in all.

- Bert -

> Stef
>
> On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
>> Hi Diane,
>>
>> There are a few different fixes out there, if you check this list I  
>> believe
>> Philippe once posted a list of all the different fixes.
>>
>> Here is mine:
>> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5217
>>
>> In my opinion Monticello Configurations are essential, although I  
>> have
>> experienced some trouble with competing versions in different  
>> repositories.
>>
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> Ron Teitelbaum
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev-
>>> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Danie Roux
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:41 AM
>>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>>> Subject: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in  
>>> 3.9
>>> or3.10?
>>>
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to get Monticello Configurations to work, ideally  
>>> in
>>> a 3.9 based image. I would be very interested to hear from anyone
>>> using it successfully in a 3.9 or 3.10 image.
>>>
>>> I take these steps:
>>>
>>> - Start with a new Squeak3.9.1-final-7075 image.
>>> - Open up a Monticello Configurations from the menu
>>> - Add Balloon-ar.13
>>> - Add repository http://source.squeakfoundation.org/Balloon from  
>>> the list
>>>
>>> I can now hit update (from repositories), and get Balloon-ar.14.  
>>> Cool,
>>> as expected.
>>>
>>> - I click Store, and save it as test.mcm in my local package-cache
>>> repository.
>>> - I now close everything and open a Monticello Browser again.
>>> - I open my package-cache repository
>>> - Select "test" project
>>> - Select test.mcm on the right pane and I get a walkback:
>>>
>>> "My subclass should have overridden #loadVersionInfo"
>>>
>>> --
>>> Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix - http://danieroux.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

Philippe Marschall
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
2008/6/27, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> do the configurations manage different servers ?
>  do the configurations manage different servers on a per package level?

Not sure you want this. If it has the same UUID it must be the same
package. Works fine for Maven.

Cheers
Philippe

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

stephane ducasse
I want to load
        magritte from lulkas repors
        moose from squeaksource
        ob from wiresong

in one click.

Stef

On Jun 28, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Philippe Marschall wrote:

> 2008/6/27, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>> do the configurations manage different servers ?
>> do the configurations manage different servers on a per package  
>> level?
>
> Not sure you want this. If it has the same UUID it must be the same
> package. Works fine for Maven.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

keith1y
stephane ducasse wrote:
> I want to load
>     magritte from lulkas repors
>     moose from squeaksource
>     ob from wiresong
>
> in one click.
>
> Stef
Enter Sake/Packages , (exit mcm?)

Keith


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

Philippe Marschall
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
no, you want magritte-lr.x, moose-td.y and ob-cp-z

2008/6/28, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:

> I want to load
>         magritte from lulkas repors
>         moose from squeaksource
>         ob from wiresong
>
>  in one click.
>
>  Stef
>
>
>  On Jun 28, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
>
> > 2008/6/27, stephane ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > > do the configurations manage different servers ?
> > > do the configurations manage different servers on a per package level?
> > >
> >
> > Not sure you want this. If it has the same UUID it must be the same
> > package. Works fine for Maven.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Philippe
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Does anyone use Monticello Configurations in 3.9 or3.10?

Bert Freudenberg
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Am 28.06.2008 um 10:46 schrieb stephane ducasse:

> I want to load
> magritte from lulkas repors
> moose from squeaksource
> ob from wiresong
>
> in one click.


This will work fine with a manually saved mcm. MCM also has a feature  
to look for the "latest" versions of packages, which works still fine  
if you employ sane naming practices.

But since MC does not enforce a particular file naming scheme this  
might fail if different repositories use conflicting version numbers  
for the same package.

- Bert -