In trying to recap this past year, my first year of being *back* into the Smalltalk world, I googled "randal schwartz squeak", and saw: Results 1 - 10 of about 5,910 for (randal OR randall) schwartz squeak. I think about 5700 of those pages didn't exist a year ago. Here's the highlights: * Created my blog methodsandmessages.vox.com to publish squeak news and observations * Demonstrated Squeak and Scratch on the "Lab with Leo" show, hosted by Leo Laporte and distributed in Canada and Australia * Had both Avi Bryant and Dan Ingalls on FLOSS Weekly, my weekly podcast with an audience of about 25,000 or so. Squeak was mentioned once or twice. :) * Managed to sneak a mention of Smalltalk and Squeak into just about every other episode of FLOSS Weekly * Got Leo Laporte thinking about a weekly Seaside tutorial video podcast, in which we would run through my courseware to teach him (and the audience, by proxy) how Seaside and Squeak works * Provided the weekly Squeak News segment for James Robertson's Industry Misinterpretations podcast, broading the continued presence and currency of Squeak throughout the Smalltalk community * In my role as Leadership Team member, coordinated the cutover of the squeak.org to Aida, and am currently sheparding the Squeak 4.0 relicense effort * Established the meme "the year of Smalltalk" in my blog, which has been used as a unifying rallying cry to help the resurgence in 2008 * Got the Brazillian FISL conference interested enough in Smalltalk from my 2008 presentation that they created an entire Smalltalk/Squeak miniconf for 2009 (which I'm just now putting out the CFP for, by the way) * Got interviewed by InfoQ about the Smalltalk Comeback, where I mentioned Squeak prominently * Got interviewed by WebDevRadio about Seaside, mentioning Squeak at least a few times * Got interviewed by Reflective Surface, a blog about Ruby-ish things about Seaside and Squeak * Produced a keynote talk at STIC's Smalltalk Solutions 2008, which included my Seaside talk and a Persistence talk, both incorporating many mentions of Squeak * Gave a three-hour lecture at OSCON 2008 on Smalltalk and Seaside, using Squeak as the primary demonstration tool * Produced a few videos for Vimeo on how to use Squeak, and got a few other people using Vimeo for hosting, including creating a Squeak group there * Created a "Seaside Bootcamp" class, to be delivered by BigNerdRanch in Germany in a few months * Promoted Squeak via watching various twitter and blog messages for mentions of Smalltalk, Seaside, and Squeak * Answered many questions on squeak-dev, beginners, and seaside mailing lists. * Hung out in the #squeak, #seaside, and ##smalltalk channels on freenode, and the #smalltalk channel on Parcplace, answering questions and occasionally annoying the other locals * Gave the "Seaside: your next web framework" advocacy presentation at many companies and conferences, which features Squeak as one of the many Smalltalk implementations that runs Seaside * Presented a talk on Squeak GLORP at the PostgreSQL day in Portland * Got interviewed by GeekCred podcast for a general biography, but managed to get Squeak mentioned in there once or twice * Answered Smalltalk and Squeak-related questions on Stack Overflow Ok, I'll stop there. I'm sure there's three important things I'm leaving out, and 20 trivial things. Looking back at this list, all I can say is... "oops, I set the bar too high for my second year". :) But seriously, I have dedicated, and continue to dedicate, my time and energy and attention and skills to promoting Squeak as the basis for a sane programming environment to make it easier for all of us to get things done, and cooperate and collaborate in an open-source way to avoid repeating ourselves. I would be honored to serve a second term on the Leadership Team, to help complete the relicensing effort, and work with all parties to figure out what Squeak 5.0 needs to be. We're at an interesting point in Squeak's development (think: "the teenage years"), and continuity with the past and a vision for the future are cruicial. Please consider me as you cast your ballot. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion |
On 19.02.2009, at 22:43, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > In trying to recap this past year, my first year of being *back* into > the Smalltalk world, I googled "randal schwartz squeak", and saw: > > Results 1 - 10 of about 5,910 for (randal OR randall) schwartz squeak. > > I think about 5700 of those pages didn't exist a year ago. Hehe, at that rate in 3 more years you'll be Google's Squeaker #1 :) Impressive list. You should repost next week, when campaigning officially starts ;) - Bert - |
Yow - go Randal. I have to say bravo, valuable work for the community there!
-Simon (who is fully confused about dates and procedures for nominations, voting, and much else, but expects it'll all work out in the end.) |
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
Randal and I had a discussion with Goran about this very thing a few
days ago and it was not Goran's intention that campaigning not start before the 22nd. The only relevance to that date is that it is the last day potential candidates can be nominated. I see no benefit to limiting the discussion to one week. Start early and give people an opportunity to read your comments, respond with questions, and for you to respond back. Ken On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:11 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > You should repost next week, when campaigning > officially starts ;) > > - Bert - signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
I see. I was taking the schedule at
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6116 as definitive. - Bert - On 19.02.2009, at 23:57, Ken Causey wrote: > Randal and I had a discussion with Goran about this very thing a few > days ago and it was not Goran's intention that campaigning not start > before the 22nd. The only relevance to that date is that it is the > last > day potential candidates can be nominated. I see no benefit to > limiting > the discussion to one week. Start early and give people an > opportunity > to read your comments, respond with questions, and for you to respond > back. > > Ken > > On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:11 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> You should repost next week, when campaigning >> officially starts ;) >> >> - Bert - > |
>>>>> "Bert" == Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> writes:
Bert> I see. I was taking the schedule at Bert> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6116 Bert> as definitive. Indeed: 22nd February to 29th February: Campaigning period During this period the candidates should ideally present themselves on squeak-dev, unless they have already done so, and the community can ask questions. Last year we organised a structured Q&A activity and I will not be doing it this year, but of course if someone else steps up to do it - just mail me! "unless they have already done so" would cover it. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion |
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "Bert" == Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> writes: > > Bert> I see. I was taking the schedule at > Bert> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6116 > > Bert> as definitive. > > Indeed: > > 22nd February to 29th February: Campaigning period > > During this period the candidates should ideally present themselves on > squeak-dev, unless they have already done so, and the community can ask > questions. Last year we organised a structured Q&A activity and I will > not be doing it this year, but of course if someone else steps up to do > it - just mail me! > > "unless they have already done so" would cover it. Or a bit higher up: "Campaigning is just fine during this period." :) BUT... in the original post it did indeed NOT say so, but I did actually post a correction: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/133911.html ...so I think I have done what I could to remedy the mistake, sorry for the confusion. regards, Göran |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |