Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

[squeak-dev] From 3.8-6665-basic to 3.9

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Yoshiki Ohshima-2

[squeak-dev] From 3.8-6665-basic to 3.9

Hello,

I'm getting curious to see the full history of changes so what I'm
now trying to do is to update 3.8-6665-full image to 3.9 alpha. I did a
little magic incantation to set the version, and doing updates.

As 6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew.cs warns, it *really* takes long
time... I'm on it for a few hours. It could be because of the slow
network connection I have, but does anybody have an idea about how
long should it take, in a ballpark figure, with a one-year old laptop
computer?

-- Yoshiki

Yoshiki Ohshima-2

Re: [squeak-dev] From 3.8-6665-basic to 3.9

At Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:04:56 -0700,
Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting curious to see the full history of changes so what I'm
> now trying to do is to update 3.8-6665-full image to 3.9 alpha. I did a
> little magic incantation to set the version, and doing updates.
>
> As 6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew.cs warns, it *really* takes long
> time... I'm on it for a few hours. It could be because of the slow
> network connection I have, but does anybody have an idea about how
> long should it take, in a ballpark figure, with a one-year old laptop
> computer?

6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew.cs took about 6 hours with some dialog
clicks here and there. And in parallel, I was doing from 3.9-7067 to
3.10.2 and it took about 5 hours. And, the first one is still at
6695loadScriptLoader19-stephaneducasse.cs.

So my guesstimate is that it is going to take about 24 hours to 48
hours for going from 3.8-6665 to the latest. (From 3.8-6665 to the
latest Etoys, it would be probably 30 minutes or such.)

-- Yoshiki

Michael Rueger-6

Re: [squeak-dev] From 3.8-6665-basic to 3.9

Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:

> At Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:04:56 -0700,
> Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm getting curious to see the full history of changes so what I'm
>> now trying to do is to update 3.8-6665-full image to 3.9 alpha. I did a
>> little magic incantation to set the version, and doing updates.
>>
>> As 6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew.cs warns, it *really* takes long
>> time... I'm on it for a few hours. It could be because of the slow
>> network connection I have, but does anybody have an idea about how
>> long should it take, in a ballpark figure, with a one-year old laptop
>> computer?

Maybe someone has a solution to the problem:

at least from my Sophie building experience a large part is weak
dictionary stuff when loading a large number of Monticello packages at
once (e.g. through config maps).

Michael

Yoshiki Ohshima-2

Re: [squeak-dev] From 3.8-6665-basic to 3.9

At Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:33:41 -0700,
Michael Rueger wrote:

>
> Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> > At Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:04:56 -0700,
> > Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm getting curious to see the full history of changes so what I'm
> >> now trying to do is to update 3.8-6665-full image to 3.9 alpha. I did a
> >> little magic incantation to set the version, and doing updates.
> >>
> >> As 6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew.cs warns, it *really* takes long
> >> time... I'm on it for a few hours. It could be because of the slow
> >> network connection I have, but does anybody have an idea about how
> >> long should it take, in a ballpark figure, with a one-year old laptop
> >> computer?
>
> Maybe someone has a solution to the problem:
>
> at least from my Sophie building experience a large part is weak
> dictionary stuff when loading a large number of Monticello packages at
> once (e.g. through config maps).

I ran it overnight and got errors. And realized that I should have
started from 3.8-6665-basic, not 3.8-6665-full. -basic can pass
6675InstallPkgsWarning-dew in half an hour or so.

And Squeak3.9b-7053.changes (right before the condensing for V39) is
a "proper super .changes" of Squeak3.8-6665-basic.changes (of course
not Squeak3.8-6665-full.changes; that is why I wanted to make my own
.changes file with everything), so I really don't have to do the
update.

-- Yoshiki