Historical help needed: PNGReadWriter class test1
HI all, In my code travels I have come across: 'RAA 12/10/2000 10:11 PNGReadWriter class test1 {as yet unclassified}' which has become lava code*. It would probably be good to revive it as a test. I would like to know what was in the files it referenced. My curiosity wants to know if they were some specially tortuous or just ordinary files. ( My assistant Puck is hoping for tortuous. ;-) I am also, at Puck's urging, looking for other files that would be a good test of a png read writer. the portion of the code that looks at files is here: d0 := FileDirectory default. d1 := d0 directoryNamed: 'PngSuite Folder'. d2 := d0 directoryNamed: 'BIG PNG'. {d0. d1. d2}. "keep compiler quiet" "== citrus_none_sub.png citrus_adm7_adap.png citrus_adm7_aver.png citrus_adm7_non.png citrus_adm7_paeth.png pngs-img-ie5mac.png ==" fileInfo := {d2. {'citrus_adm7_adap.png'}}. Yours in service, and curiosity, --Jerome Peace *lava code is code left over from historical times which has no use in the current image and yet no one is willing to take responsiblity for removing it. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ |
Hi -
Have you looked at the PNGReadWriterTests in the GraphicsTests package? It has some 30+ tests for PNGReadWriter in a variety of situations. Cheers, - Andreas Jerome Peace wrote: > Historical help needed: PNGReadWriter class test1 > > HI all, > > In my code travels I have come across: > > 'RAA 12/10/2000 10:11 PNGReadWriter class test1 {as > yet unclassified}' > > which has become lava code*. > > It would probably be good to revive it as a test. I > would like to know what was in the files it > referenced. My curiosity wants to know if they were > some specially tortuous or just ordinary files. ( My > assistant Puck is hoping for tortuous. ;-) > > I am also, at Puck's urging, looking for other files > that would be a good test of a png read writer. > > > the portion of the code that looks at files is here: > > > d0 := FileDirectory default. > d1 := d0 directoryNamed: 'PngSuite Folder'. > d2 := d0 directoryNamed: 'BIG PNG'. > {d0. d1. d2}. > "keep compiler quiet" > "== > citrus_none_sub.png > citrus_adm7_adap.png > citrus_adm7_aver.png > citrus_adm7_non.png > citrus_adm7_paeth.png > pngs-img-ie5mac.png > ==" > fileInfo := {d2. {'citrus_adm7_adap.png'}}. > > > Yours in service, and curiosity, --Jerome Peace > > *lava code is code left over from historical times > which has no use in the current image and yet no one > is willing to take responsiblity for removing it. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > |
In reply to this post by Jerome Peace
Jerome Peace wrote:
> Historical help needed: PNGReadWriter class test1 > > HI all, > > In my code travels I have come across: > > 'RAA 12/10/2000 10:11 PNGReadWriter class test1 {as > yet unclassified}' > > which has become lava code*. > > It would probably be good to revive it as a test. I > would like to know what was in the files it > referenced. My curiosity wants to know if they were > some specially tortuous or just ordinary files. ( My > assistant Puck is hoping for tortuous. ;-) > > I am also, at Puck's urging, looking for other files > that would be a good test of a png read writer. > > > the portion of the code that looks at files is here: > > > d0 := FileDirectory default. > d1 := d0 directoryNamed: 'PngSuite Folder'. > d2 := d0 directoryNamed: 'BIG PNG'. > {d0. d1. d2}. > "keep compiler quiet" > "== > citrus_none_sub.png > citrus_adm7_adap.png > citrus_adm7_aver.png > citrus_adm7_non.png > citrus_adm7_paeth.png > pngs-img-ie5mac.png > ==" > fileInfo := {d2. {'citrus_adm7_adap.png'}}. > > found. The PngSuite can also be found, but I think this test method could be ditched or reworked to be not reliant on arbitrary stuff from external sources. It was probably useful in development but less so in deployment. Karl > Yours in service, and curiosity, --Jerome Peace > > *lava code is code left over from historical times > which has no use in the current image and yet no one > is willing to take responsiblity for removing it. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |