[squeak-dev] Maximum Delay

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] Maximum Delay

Nicolas Cellier
I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321

Is this limit obsolete ?

What would happen with a LargeInteger delay ?

Nicolas

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Maximum Delay

David T. Lewis
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
> 2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321
>
> Is this limit obsolete ?
>
> What would happen with a LargeInteger delay ?

I'm not sure of the exact status of this in the various images, but
you can read all about it in Mantis 854.

Dave


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Maximum Delay

Nicolas Cellier
Ah, thanks, I see that Tim's change (Delay
class>>#primSignal:atMilliseconds:) was included in 3.9 image, but
Andreas started from 3.8

So this might be a regression in (future) 3.11, that's why I ask.

That does not explain the limit in 3.9. Why setting the limit to
SmallInteger maxVal half, and why a limit at all if Tim's change allow
for LargeInteger delays ?

Nicolas

2009/4/19 David T. Lewis <[hidden email]>:

> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>> I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
>> 2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321
>>
>> Is this limit obsolete ?
>>
>> What would happen with a LargeInteger delay ?
>
> I'm not sure of the exact status of this in the various images, but
> you can read all about it in Mantis 854.
>
> Dave
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Maximum Delay

David T. Lewis
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:54:36PM +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

> 2009/4/19 David T. Lewis <[hidden email]>:
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> >> I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
> >> 2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321
> >>
> >> Is this limit obsolete ?
> >>
> >> What would happen with a LargeInteger delay ?
> >
> > I'm not sure of the exact status of this in the various images, but
> > you can read all about it in Mantis 854.
> >
> Ah, thanks, I see that Tim's change (Delay
> class>>#primSignal:atMilliseconds:) was included in 3.9 image, but
> Andreas started from 3.8
>
> So this might be a regression in (future) 3.11, that's why I ask.
>
> That does not explain the limit in 3.9. Why setting the limit to
> SmallInteger maxVal half, and why a limit at all if Tim's change allow
> for LargeInteger delays ?

I think that the limit came from the CheckInitialDelayTime-854-v4-laza.2.cs
attachment on Mantis 854. I don't recall now, but this may have been
added after Tim's change. I do not know if it is needed now or not.

Dave


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] Re: Maximum Delay

Andreas.Raab
In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier
Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
> 2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321
>
> Is this limit obsolete ?

Yes. See http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6576 which originally
addressed the issue.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] Re: Maximum Delay

Nicolas Cellier
Thank you
I missed this bit of history!

2009/4/19 Andreas Raab <[hidden email]>:

> Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that there was a Delay limit set to (SmallInteger maxVal //
>> 2) before http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7321
>>
>> Is this limit obsolete ?
>
> Yes. See http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6576 which originally addressed
> the issue.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>