[squeak-dev] Mondrian help

The concept is that we are voting against all other candidates not listed so
how about:

"Against All Other Candidates"

or something like that.

Ron

How about three?


"Then thou must count to three. Three shall be the number of the counting and
the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither
shalt thou count two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. Five is
right out. Once the number three, being the number of the counting, be
reached, then lobbest thou the Holy Hand Grenade in the direction of thine
foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it."
--
Jeff

Danke

Enviado desde mi iPod

El Feb 20, 2009, a las 12:04, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> escribió:

On 20.02.2009, at 13:02, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

On 2/20/09 9:49 AM, "Göran Krampe" <[hidden email]> wrote:

But I think the SFC had something to do with us not using the word
"board", right?

Could expand ?


We are trying to join the SFC, which would handle the legal and financial issues, which is far simpler than incorporating on our own:

http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/

The SFC has a "board of directors". That is a fixed legal term and they asked us to not use it to refer to the community-elected representatives.

But if you look at the list of projects there is at least one (Sugar Labs) that has an "oversight board" so that term is apparently fine with the SFC.

- Bert -





      Yahoo! Cocina
Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/

+1 to all of the below.  I would support a reduction to 5 as it is my
understanding is that when a group that needs to communicate well grows
beyond this number the efficiency of communication drops significantly.

Ken

On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 02:33 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

On 20-Feb-09, at 5:59 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>

> I find the term "None Of The Above" rather incomprehensible, it  
> seems to only make sense on a paper ballot. In the online voting  
> system we used one would rank candidates that should *not* be on the  
> board "below" that item.
>
> But I do not have a better idea.

How about None of the Below?

On Feb 20, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Colin Putney wrote:

That sounds good.

---
Mark Volkmann
http://www.ociweb.com/mark

Dear Raymond,

Since a few weeks, I have been doing a major overall of Mondrian to  
make SqueakMondrian compatible with the Visualworks version.
The problem you describes does not seem to be mondrian related. You  
basically need to identify whether methods have the same name than  
instance variable.
A very inefficient way could be for instance:

TranslucentColor methodDict keys reject: [:k |
        (k last = $:)
                ifTrue: [ (TranslucentColor instVarNames includes: k allButLast  
asString) ]
                ifFalse: [(TranslucentColor instVarNames includes: k asString)]].

The returned by this expression does not contains "alpha" and "alpha:"  
methods.

Alexandre


On 20 Feb 2009, at 00:39, Raymond Asselin wrote:

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Le 21/02/09, Bergel, Alexandre <[hidden email]> écrivait :

>Dear Raymond,
>
>Since a few weeks, I have been doing a major overall of
Mondrian to  
>make SqueakMondrian compatible with the Visualworks version.
>The problem you describes does not seem to be mondrian
related. You  
>basically need to identify whether methods have the same name
than  
>instance variable.
>A very inefficient way could be for instance:
>
>TranslucentColor methodDict keys reject: [:k |
>   (k last = $:)
>       ifTrue: [ (TranslucentColor instVarNames includes: k
allButLast  
>asString) ]
>       ifFalse: [(TranslucentColor instVarNames includes: k
asString)]].
>
>The returned by this expression does not contains "alpha" and
"alpha:"   method of
>> each class of my package.  In my code I did what follow to
eliminate
>> the test-classes but don't know how to access methods
categorised as
>> 'accessing' ?
>>
>>   "I want to strip all  classes used for tests, except a class
named
>>   XPTest that I want to be in the group'"
>>   exceptClass := theClasses select:[ :cl |  cl asString =
'XPTest'].
>>   theClasses := theClasses reject:[ :cl |  cl asString endsWith:  
>> 'Test'].
>>   theClasses := theClasses , exceptClass.
>>   "Now I want to eleminate all access methods "
>>
>> Any help ?
>> Raymond
>>
>
Merci pour la réponse.

I will try it immediately

Raymond

      When starting a new thread of conversation, please don't do so by
replying to an unrelated message. The only way I can keep up with
squeak-dev is by using a threaded newsreader to gmane, and killing some
of the threads. I almost didn't see this whole conversation.


      thanks,

-C

--
Craig Latta
www.netjam.org
next show: 2009-03-13 (www.thishere.org)