[squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

Chun, Sungjin
Hi,

First, I do not want to create flame war or something; I just like to
hear opinions.

1. Which one is easy to create file upload and download web application?
I've created small PIM web application using Seaside but this file transfer
application is different from my previous one; it just takes upload and generate
link for file and make the download happen when the link be requested.

2. Which one shows better performance for this problem?
File size will be up to 10 or more GB but number of concurrent users are
at most 10 or 20.

Thanks in advance.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

Philippe Marschall
2008/7/23 "S.J.Chun" <[hidden email]>:
> Hi,
>
> First, I do not want to create flame war or something; I just like to
> hear opinions.
>
> 1. Which one is easy to create file upload and download web application?

html fileUpload

and:

self session returnResponse:

these are for small files only though

Kom on Seaside 2.9 has experimental upload streaming into a temporary file.

> I've created small PIM web application using Seaside but this file transfer
> application is different from my previous one; it just takes upload and generate
> link for file and make the download happen when the link be requested.
>
> 2. Which one shows better performance for this problem?
> File size will be up to 10 or more GB but number of concurrent users are
> at most 10 or 20.

10 GB? Per upload? And 10 to 20 Users uploading at the same time? Srsly?

Cheers
Philippe

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

Chun, Sungjin
In reply to this post by Chun, Sungjin
Hmm,

it seems that with current Seaside(I'm using 2.8) large file upload mught be hard
task.

And for file size, not all files have that size.(Sorry for my poor english) But some of
the files will have that size.

My current idea is that I should create module(?) for Comanche or Swazoo for File
Upload (this just process multipart/form request for file upload with additional
parameters) and small web application or module for processing download url.(This
might be possible with Seaside with RESTable URL support or simple module).

Thank you for your answer.

 

----- Original Message -----
   From: Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]>
   To: ""S.J.Chun"" <[hidden email]>, The general-purpose Squeak developers list <[hidden email]>
   Sent: 08-07-23 14:10:40
   Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

> 2. Which one shows better performance for this problem?
> File size will be up to 10 or more GB but number of concurrent users are
> at most 10 or 20.

10 GB? Per upload? And 10 to 20 Users uploading at the same time? Srsly?

Cheers
Philippe