I note if you go to the squeak.org website and tap but report it dumps
you into Mantis. However for novices that likely isn't helpful
and the link to a mail message from Feb isn't something anyone is
going to find, or mmm or remember.
On 5-May-09, at 9:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> I'll check it out. Also note that cc-ing
[hidden email]
> will generally be useful.
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
> John M McIntosh wrote:
>> Well then for
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581>> who would stick that into 3.11? Let alone that I'm looking at
>> 3.10.2 image
>> Added (partly)
>>
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7348>> On 5-May-09, at 2:07 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> Hi John -
>>>
>>> John M McIntosh wrote:
>>>> (I had to fix the sq 3.10.2 image because of ignored bug using
>>>> allInstances I reported years back, never fixed, but fixed in
>>>> pharo last fall).
>>>
>>> [... snip ...]
>>>
>>>> (to be fair here I could bring some fixes into the 3.10.2 image
>>>> to reduce the cpu time, but really those fixes should have gone
>>>> in years ago...)
>>>
>>> Just as an FYI, there is now a well-defined process for
>>> contributing stuff to 3.11:
>>>
>>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/134095.html>>>
>>> If these fixes are on Mantis all you need is to provide an
>>> installer script and update its status accordingly. Just try it!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Andreas
--
=
=
=
========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <
[hidden email]> Twitter:
squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.
http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com=
=
=
========================================================================
Locked
