[squeak-dev] Re: Squeak-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 20

>Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 16:28:45 +0200
>From: "Damien Cassou" <[hidden email]>
>Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Different squeak-dev flavors 2
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
> <[hidden email]>
>Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ken G. Brown <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> At 5:00 AM -0700 7/6/08, [hidden email] apparently wrote:
>>>Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:14:23 +0200
>>>From: "Damien Cassou" <[hidden email]>
>>>Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Different squeak-dev flavors 2
>>>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
> >>       <[hidden email]>
><snip>
> >
>> I'd like to have confidence that everything added to 3.10.2 also includes tests for everything added, and that all tests run unattended and everything ends green.
>> For starters, on Mac 10.5.4, fresh sq3.10.2-7179dev08.07.1 on Squeak 3.8.18beta1U.app vm, pull out the Test Runner, select all standard tests, start to run 2788 tests,  and with manual intervention required several times, it only gets to 394 run, 374 passes, 2 expected failures, 5 failures 13 error, before it quits processing.
>>
>> I think that the dev images should ship with all tests running green.
>
>
>I think these problems must be fixed by the release teams and by the
>package maintainer. As an integretor, I can't do more than you on
>these fields. The only thing I can do is to base the images on the
>latest versions.
>
>--
>Damien Cassou
>Peter von der AhÈ: ´I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
>luckª. (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)