Robert Hawley wrote:
> Hi Craig
>
> Would I like to write a proposal? Not at this stage - I am not
> sufficiently aware of who does what and of how things are done.
>
> Can you answer about is this being managed and/or fixed and about
> plans, issues and people's motivations? For example - are you involved
> in this topic?
>
> It is a topic that I am interested in, and I have a fair knowledge of
> how Morphic works. I don't know about the processes of getting things
> into the Squeak releases however. Neither do I know if the current
> protagonists for the etoys system are wanting to be involved in
> back-porting their work to Squeak.
Hi Bob,
the Squeakland Foundation, who are the protagonists for the Etoys
system, would *love* to be back in sync with the Squeak system. I'm
personally interested in exactly what you described in an earlier mail,
a "useful route into introducing and teaching Smalltalk".
I don't think that we will back-porting Etoys to 3.9 or 3.10, but rather
with the next squeak release. This is no short-term goal, but I would
like to discuss how a reunion of Squeak and Etoys could be done.
Greetings,
Rita
Squeakland Foundation
www.squeakland.org
>
> Yours
>
> Bob
>
> > Hi Bob--
> >
> > Would you like to write a proposal?
> >
> >
> > -C
> >
> > --
> > Craig Latta
> > www.netjam.org
> > next show: 2009-03-13 (www.thishere.org)
>
>
>
>
--
Rita Freudenberg
FIN-ISG
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
http://isgwww.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/isg/rita.html
Locked
