[squeak-dev] Re: [V3dot10] Patch should be applied: SystemDictionary>>recreateSpecialObjectsArray

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] Re: [V3dot10] Patch should be applied: SystemDictionary>>recreateSpecialObjectsArray

keith1y
Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> The latest Squeak3.10.1-7175-basic.zip image from http://ftp.squeak.org/current_stable/
> also left out the patch to make FFI usable in 3.10:
>
>    http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6980
>
> Thx
> Torsten
>  
I added the above patch to
http://installer.pbwiki.com/MinorFixesUnstable-Squeak3%3A10

All of the listed patches can be loaded using

Installer install: 'LatestUnstable'.

We still need to establish a "gate" process for moving patches from
Unstable to Stable. Those patches listed on the Stable page would be the
ones that are loaded by: Installer install: 'Latest'. These are
considered to be the fixes that will be included in 3.11

We could have a "vote for approval" approach, a "vote for disapproval"
approach or a "vote for suspicion" approach.

Therefore I invite readers to review the list of fixes and at first
glance just email me with any that they feel suspicious about, or have
reason to dissapprove. In two weeks I will move the rest to "Stable".

regards

Keith




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] LatestUnstable(3.11) [was: Patch should be applied: SystemDictionary>>recreateSpecialObjectsArray]

Klaus D. Witzel
On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:01:53 +0200, Keith Hodges wrote:

> Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> The latest Squeak3.10.1-7175-basic.zip image from  
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/current_stable/
>> also left out the patch to make FFI usable in 3.10:
>>
>>    http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6980
>>
>> Thx
>> Torsten
>>
> I added the above patch to  
> http://installer.pbwiki.com/MinorFixesUnstable-Squeak3%3A10
>
> All of the listed patches can be loaded using
>
> Installer install: 'LatestUnstable'.
>
> We still need to establish a "gate" process for moving patches from  
> Unstable to Stable. Those patches listed on the Stable page would be the  
> ones that are loaded by: Installer install: 'Latest'. These are  
> considered to be the fixes that will be included in 3.11
>
> We could have a "vote for approval" approach, a "vote for disapproval"  
> approach or a "vote for suspicion" approach.

This looks +1 to me; only one thing: can the release team (harvesting  
team?) perhaps offer a recommendation on that page, the default for what  
will happen after the two weeks ?

/Klaus

> Therefore I invite readers to review the list of fixes and at first  
> glance just email me with any that they feel suspicious about, or have  
> reason to dissapprove. In two weeks I will move the rest to "Stable".
>
> regards
>
> Keith