Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net)
-- Gary Dunn, Honolulu [hidden email] http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from a Newton 2100 via Mail V |
Gary Dunn wrote:
> Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried > implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) You could check out the work done in Sophie :-) Michael |
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:23 +0200, Michael Rueger wrote:
> Gary Dunn wrote: > > Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried > > implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) > > You could check out the work done in Sophie :-) Thanks! Great tip. Sophie looks like it should play a key role in Open Slate, yet there are aspects that bother me. One is the assumption that users will always have a network connection. Another is that although it is written in Squeak, the end user does not touch Squeak. They use a web browser, with a plug-in. Squeak has no such animal, right? So while I applaud the use of Squeak, I would prefer that Sophie be accessible from Squeak. -- Gary Dunn, Honolulu [hidden email] http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from Slate001 |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
Not exactly what you are looking for, but you might be interested into
this one: http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/spell-checker Lukas 2009/7/28 Gary Dunn <[hidden email]>: > Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) > -- > Gary Dunn, Honolulu > [hidden email] > http://openslate.net/ > http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ > Sent from a Newton 2100 via Mail V > > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
http://www.jvuletich.org/Squeak/Scrabble/ScrabbleEng.html
Karl On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Gary Dunn <[hidden email]> wrote: Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
WordNet class in Etoys image is also a place to look
Karl On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Gary Dunn <[hidden email]> wrote: Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
Ok,
(a) the macintosh spell checker from Sophie was dragged into Pharo, see subclasses of RBSpellChecker (b) Don't be confused by the Sophie 1.0 which is based on squeak and does not need the internet to read books unless you link out to internet media http://www.opensophie.org. New BSD license http://opensophie.org/en/about/license (c) Sophie 2.0 http://www.sophieproject.org written by a different group/organization in Java and based on a Java server in the cloud. ,On 29-Jul-09, at 1:32 AM, Gary Dunn wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:23 +0200, Michael Rueger wrote: >> Gary Dunn wrote: >>> Is there a spell checker for text morphs? If not, has anyone tried >>> implementing aspell? (http:/aspell.net) >> >> You could check out the work done in Sophie :-) > > Thanks! Great tip. > > Sophie looks like it should play a key role in Open Slate, yet there > are > aspects that bother me. One is the assumption that users will always > have a network connection. Another is that although it is written in > Squeak, the end user does not touch Squeak. They use a web browser, > with > a plug-in. Squeak has no such animal, right? So while I applaud the > use > of Squeak, I would prefer that Sophie be accessible from Squeak. > > -- > Gary Dunn, Honolulu > [hidden email] > http://openslate.net/ > http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ > Sent from Slate001 > > -- = = = ======================================================================== John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = ======================================================================== |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:46:06 John M McIntosh wrote:
> (b) Don't be confused by the Sophie 1.0 which is based on squeak [snip] > > (c) Sophie 2.0 http://www.sophieproject.org written by a different > group/organization in Java First Alice is lost to Java, now Sophie. What does Java have that Squeak doesn't have? Bigger biceps? A better tan? Whiter teeth? Dos Equis? -- Gary Dunn, Honolulu [hidden email] http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from a Newton 2100 via Mail V |
On 31.07.2009, at 00:40, Gary Dunn wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:46:06 John M McIntosh wrote: > >> (b) Don't be confused by the Sophie 1.0 which is based on squeak > [snip] >> >> (c) Sophie 2.0 http://www.sophieproject.org written by a different >> group/organization in Java > > First Alice is lost to Java, now Sophie. Alice was never implemented in Squeak. You're confusing this with Wonderland. > What does Java have that Squeak doesn't have? Bigger biceps? A > better tan? Whiter teeth? Dos Equis? Money. - Bert - |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Dunn <[hidden email]> writes:
Gary> First Alice is lost to Java, now Sophie. What does Java have that Squeak Gary> doesn't have? Bigger biceps? A better tan? Whiter teeth? Dos Equis? PHBs who "manage by magazine", seeing large ads from Sun for Java (at least, in the past), but no such large ads for Smalltalk, and becoming very nervous. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion |
In reply to this post by Gary Dunn
safety by numbers?...
But it's unfair to say Sophie is lost, since the entire 1.0 code base is open source and sitting there waiting for ownership... First Alice is lost to Java, now Sophie. What does Java have that Squeak doesn't have? Bigger biceps? A better tan? Whiter teeth? Dos Equis? -- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com =========================================================================== |
A: A wide acceptance as a vehicle for professional programming. Q: What does Squeak have that Java doesn't? A: Objects. ISO defines DATA as a representation of facts or ideas in a formalized manner capable of being communicated or manipulated by some process. Computers can transform, store, and move DATA. An object encapsulates state and behavior. Objects communicate in systems of interlinked objects. Alice (as well as Ducasse's BotsInc) teaches the essential first steps of data transformation through the behavior of predefined figures: sequence, loop, and branch. The next step for Alice/Jave must be classes, essentially the packaging of state and behavior in isolated objects. The reason is that systems of interacting objects is outside the idea of a class. The next step for Alice/Squeak could better be to illustrate that the essence of object orientation is that objects communicate to achieve a common goal. Teach the students to build systems of interacting figures in gradually more complex interaction patterns, still keeping it concrete by showing objects as concrete figures. Squeak could become the preferred environment for introducing students to the essential concepts of computing. It is important to do this before their brain is atrophied so that they can only think in terms of classes, i.e., isolated objects. We could do an essential community service if the many squeakers that are targeting the novice would join forces and work towards a common goal. Cheers --Trygve --
Trygve
Reenskaug mailto: [hidden email] Morgedalsvn. 5A http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~trygver N-0378
Oslo Tel: (+47) 22 49 57 27 Norway |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |