Now, as Squeak 3.10 released and we have to update sites.
But there are critical bugs reported by Keith, like bug in TimeDate and incorrect version number. First, i propose to reorganize squeak.org and replace Downloads page with Releases page. Releases should have a list of links to pages with separate releases , where users can read more detailed information about release and decide whether download it or not, or go back and pick another release. Now, concerning a page, which describes a release. It should contain a list key features and describe shortly what its now includes, and what is changed comparing to previous release e.t.c As well as provide a link to download & install release by single click. Also, separate page is good place to put critical fixes to base image. And as with example of 3.10, a page can contain a link to already released image, and then followed by patch list, which fixing different critical bugs. This will make it easy for newcomers to update just downloaded image without going deep with details, what is mantis or update streams. They can just download & file in a change set. Also, on a release page , user can see arguments, why he would need to download it, or what it fixes. So, instead of single downloads page, we will have a tree of pages: Releases - 3.10 - 3.9 - 3.8 - Linux VM - Windoze VM - Mac VM - squeak-dev 3.10 - funSqueak - etc.. I think this will make things more convenient for beginners and for site support as well. As well as allow to make better coverage & description of particular release. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
Oh, and one more thing,
we could also add a page for future release, and mark it like: - 3.11 (under development) and place detailed info, on what we planning on next release - a roadmap - a team info, - contact info & info how users can participate -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Now, as Squeak 3.10 released and we have to update sites. > But there are critical bugs reported by Keith, like bug in TimeDate > and incorrect version number. > > First, i propose to reorganize squeak.org and replace Downloads page > with Releases page. I think we better stay with Downloads page (everyone is used of Downloads name, specially newcomers are looking for such page first) but yes, let there be additional pages for each release with release notes etc. Downloads page holds therefore simply a current release while older releases are linked from that page. I also agree that we introduce patches, which are accessible directly from Downloads page (maybe even something like Service packs?). TimeDate and version patch for instance can be a first such patch. > Releases should have a list of links to pages with separate releases , > where users can read more detailed information about release > and decide whether download it or not, or go back and pick another release. > > Now, concerning a page, which describes a release. > It should contain a list key features and describe shortly what its > now includes, and what is changed comparing to previous release e.t.c > As well as provide a link to download & install release by single click. > > Also, separate page is good place to put critical fixes to base image. > And as with example of 3.10, a page can contain a link to > already released image, and then followed by patch list, which fixing > different critical bugs. > > This will make it easy for newcomers to update just downloaded image > without going deep with details, what is mantis or update streams. > They can just download & file in a change set. > Also, on a release page , user can see arguments, why he would need to > download it, or what it fixes. > > So, instead of single downloads page, we will have a tree of pages: > > Releases > - 3.10 > - 3.9 > - 3.8 > - Linux VM > - Windoze VM > - Mac VM > - squeak-dev 3.10 > - funSqueak > - etc.. > > I think this will make things more convenient for beginners and for > site support as well. > As well as allow to make better coverage & description of particular release. > > -- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si |
In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko
On Fri, 09 May 2008 16:08:01 +0300, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> First, i propose to reorganize squeak.org and replace Downloads page > with Releases page. > > Releases should have a list of links to pages with separate releases , > where users can read more detailed information about release and decide > whether download it or not, or go back and pick another release. <snip details> > I think this will make things more convenient for beginners and for site > support as well. > As well as allow to make better coverage & description of particular > release. Yes, yes and yes. Chris |
In reply to this post by Janko Mivšek
Okay, how about following layout:
---------- Downloads. To use Squeak, you need to have two things: blabla A current release is Squeak X.YZ. Click here for release details. - a single-click download of VM+image+sources for Win32 - a single-click download of VM+image+sources for Mac - a single-click download of VM+image+sources for Linux -------- Releases - Squeak 3.10 . Release date: XX-YY-ZZ This release is based on blablabla short descrition. Click for more details & downloads. - Squeak 3.10 full . Release date: XX-YY-ZZ This release is based on blablabla short descrition. Click for more details & downloads. - Squeak 3.X . Release date: XX-YY-ZZ This release is based on blablabla short descrition. Click for more details & downloads. - Squeak VM Win32. Release date: XX-YY-ZZ This release is based on blablabla short descrition. Click for more details & downloads. ---- 2008/5/9 Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]>: > Igor Stasenko wrote: >> >> Now, as Squeak 3.10 released and we have to update sites. >> But there are critical bugs reported by Keith, like bug in TimeDate >> and incorrect version number. >> >> First, i propose to reorganize squeak.org and replace Downloads page >> with Releases page. > > I think we better stay with Downloads page (everyone is used of > Downloads name, specially newcomers are looking for such page first) but > yes, let there be additional pages for each release with release notes etc. > Downloads page holds therefore simply a current release while older releases > are linked from that page. > > I also agree that we introduce patches, which are accessible directly from > Downloads page (maybe even something like Service packs?). TimeDate and > version patch for instance can be a first such patch. > > >> Releases should have a list of links to pages with separate releases , >> where users can read more detailed information about release >> and decide whether download it or not, or go back and pick another >> release. >> >> Now, concerning a page, which describes a release. >> It should contain a list key features and describe shortly what its >> now includes, and what is changed comparing to previous release e.t.c >> As well as provide a link to download & install release by single click. >> >> Also, separate page is good place to put critical fixes to base image. >> And as with example of 3.10, a page can contain a link to >> already released image, and then followed by patch list, which fixing >> different critical bugs. >> >> This will make it easy for newcomers to update just downloaded image >> without going deep with details, what is mantis or update streams. >> They can just download & file in a change set. >> Also, on a release page , user can see arguments, why he would need to >> download it, or what it fixes. >> >> So, instead of single downloads page, we will have a tree of pages: >> >> Releases >> - 3.10 >> - 3.9 >> - 3.8 >> - Linux VM >> - Windoze VM >> - Mac VM >> - squeak-dev 3.10 >> - funSqueak >> - etc.. >> >> I think this will make things more convenient for beginners and for >> site support as well. >> As well as allow to make better coverage & description of particular >> release. >> >> > > -- > Janko Mivšek > AIDA/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |