Dear all,
I'm just looking at the Team list on http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/ and wondering, how many those teams are still actual or alive. For the sake of clarity I'll put on that list only those teams, which are current and alive. Others can be put to the separate web page (team archive, past teams or something). What do you think? Also, please check if the information is up to date, if team leaders and coordinators are the right ones etc. Best regards Janko Mivšek from the Web team |
For enhancing the clarity of Teams page I'm brainstorming possible
reorganization of teams list, by introducing a hierarchy, something like this: Teams General Box Admins Documentation Team Election News Release Team (here or below?) Web Team Stewards (or Technical?) Balloon Stewards Compression Stewards FFI Stewards Graphics Stewards I/O Stewards Modules Morphic Stewards Packages Software Engineering Team ToolBuilder Is this enough or should we introduce some other subcategory too (like Other)? What are the Stewards? I don't find the explanation on the team page. Description in one sentence? What are the coordinators? Description of their role is missing too. I would also put column with team leader names before coordinators, because they are most important and responsible for the team, more than coordinators (which are from the Board, right?). JAnko Janko Mivšek wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm just looking at the Team list on > http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/ and wondering, how many those > teams are still actual or alive. For the sake of clarity I'll put on > that list only those teams, which are current and alive. Others can be > put to the separate web page (team archive, past teams or something). > What do you think? > > Also, please check if the information is up to date, if team leaders and > coordinators are the right ones etc. > > Best regards > Janko Mivšek from the Web team > > > -- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si |
Janko Mivšek wrote:
> For enhancing the clarity of Teams page I'm brainstorming possible > reorganization of teams list, by introducing a hierarchy, something > like this: > > Teams > > General > > Box Admins Alive > Documentation Team mathew ? > Election once a year > > News alive > Release Team (here or below?) almost > Web Team alive > > Stewards (or Technical?) all these seem dead. Looking trough the mail list archives will tell which groups are moving. I think we can remove references to the stewards and lists that have not been used for the last year. This kind of stale info on the website just confuse and give a wrong picture of the community. Karl > > Balloon Stewards > Compression Stewards > FFI Stewards > Graphics Stewards > I/O Stewards > Modules > Morphic Stewards > Packages > Software Engineering Team > ToolBuilder > > > Is this enough or should we introduce some other subcategory too (like > Other)? > > What are the Stewards? I don't find the explanation on the team page. > Description in one sentence? > > What are the coordinators? Description of their role is missing too. > > I would also put column with team leader names before coordinators, > because they are most important and responsible for the team, more > than coordinators (which are from the Board, right?). > > JAnko > > > Janko Mivšek wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I'm just looking at the Team list on >> http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/ and wondering, how many those >> teams are still actual or alive. For the sake of clarity I'll put on >> that list only those teams, which are current and alive. Others can >> be put to the separate web page (team archive, past teams or >> something). What do you think? >> >> Also, please check if the information is up to date, if team leaders >> and coordinators are the right ones etc. >> >> Best regards >> Janko Mivšek from the Web team >> >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Janko Mivšek
On Thu, 08 May 2008 12:43:54 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
> Dear all, > > I'm just looking at the Team list on > http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/ and wondering, how many those > teams are still actual or alive. For the sake of clarity I'll put on > that list only those teams, which are current and alive. Please ;) The GSoC2008 team is current and alive, has coordinator/team leader, a list and members. Mind to put an entry for GSoC2008 at the top? TIA. /Klaus > Others can be put to the separate web page (team archive, past teams or > something). What do you think? > > Also, please check if the information is up to date, if team leaders and > coordinators are the right ones etc. > > Best regards > Janko Mivšek from the Web team > > > |
In reply to this post by Janko Mivšek
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 01:08:57PM +0200, Janko Miv??ek wrote:
> For enhancing the clarity of Teams page I'm brainstorming possible > reorganization of teams list, by introducing a hierarchy, something like > this: > > Documentation Team Once SBE came out, I stopped doing much about the documentation team. I still do some stuff on the wiki here and there, but I'm mostly doing release stuff right now. If anyone wants to work on documentation, a good list of what needs to be done is at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808 http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2352 > Release Team (here or below?) I made a home-page for the release team: http://installer.pbwiki.org/SqueakReleaseTeam -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ |
2008/5/9 Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]>:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 01:08:57PM +0200, Janko Miv??ek wrote: >> For enhancing the clarity of Teams page I'm brainstorming possible >> reorganization of teams list, by introducing a hierarchy, something like >> this: >> >> Documentation Team > > Once SBE came out, I stopped doing much about the > documentation team. I still do some stuff on the wiki here and > there, but I'm mostly doing release stuff right now. If anyone > wants to work on documentation, a good list of what needs to be > done is at > > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808 > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2352 > >> Release Team (here or below?) > > I made a home-page for the release team: > http://installer.pbwiki.org/SqueakReleaseTeam > --- PBwiki is in read-only mode. PBwiki is undergoing unscheduled maintenance and will be back in the early morning PDT. Your wiki is read-only for the moment, but your data is safe. Updates here. We're sorry for the inconvenience. --- Should i care to say, that its better to have mission critical public resources within reachability limits of box-admins? ;) > -- > Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
> We're sorry for the inconvenience. > --- > > Should i care to say, that its better to have mission critical public > resources within reachability limits of box-admins? ;) > > Its called outsourcing... do what you do best and pay others to do what they do best. In this case pbwiki is free, and making squeak/wiki do what pbwiki does will take up resources from somewhere else. I think it is called "compromise" Keith p.s. this is the first downtime I have seen on pbwiki for all the time I have been using it which is over 18 months now. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |