[squeak-dev] [help] Looking for assistance in debugging unimplemented calls.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[squeak-dev] [help] Looking for assistance in debugging unimplemented calls.

Jerome Peace
[help] Looking for assistance in debugging unimplemented calls.


Hi all,

Squeak 7159 has 178 unimplemented calls.
This is less than in 3.9 but still a lot.

Some have good explainations others are obvious spelling errors.
Some are ancient some have been recently installed.
Indeed the installer seems to have at least four. (hi Keith :-)


I have written a test to keep a lid on them.

I have also writen patches where I felt I could safely do so.
In this regard I am writing for help.
Would someone who is in a postition to do so please install the patches
 and then run the complete tests to see if any of them break something obvious.
I don't think they will but I touched a lot of code
and may have guessed wrong on some of them.
I have been known to do that. :}

The tests and patches are available on Mantis:

http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7042
7042 [fixes][tests] Whitling down unimplemented calls in sq7159

Yours in curiosity and service, --Jerome Peace




      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] [help] Looking for assistance in debugging unimplemented calls.

keith1y
Jerome Peace wrote:

> [help] Looking for assistance in debugging unimplemented calls.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Squeak 7159 has 178 unimplemented calls.
> This is less than in 3.9 but still a lot.
>
>
> Indeed the installer seems to have at least four. (hi Keith :-)
>  
I might be wrong but that looks like SARInstaller to me

Keith