Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

[squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - 502 bad gateway

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

17 messages Options

Michael Haupt-3

[squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - 502 bad gateway

Hi,

is this only me, or does the server have a problem?

Best,

Michael

laza

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - 502 bad gateway

Same here.

Alex

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Michael Haupt<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this only me, or does the server have a problem?
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
>

Bert Freudenberg

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - 502 bad gateway

I restarted it.

Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.

- Bert -

Bert Freudenberg

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

On 02.09.2009, at 10:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> I restarted it.
>
> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.

And to any Seaside developer: would be awesome if you could get
squeaksource working on a trunk image. Code is here:

http://www.squeaksource.com/ss.html

- Bert -

Edgar J. De Cleene

[squeak-dev] Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de>

On 9/2/09 6:18 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 02.09.2009, at 10:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> I restarted it.
>>
>> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.
>
> And to any Seaside developer: would be awesome if you could get
> squeaksource working on a trunk image. Code is here:
>
> http://www.squeaksource.com/ss.html
>
> - Bert -

Hi Bert , I wish try with my own trunk derived image.

I looking and stupid quick script could be.

| mcc version lista |
mcc := MCWorkingCopyBrowser new repository: (MCHttpRepository location:
'http://www.squeaksource.com/ss' user: '' password: '').
lista := mcc repository allFileNames copyWithout: mcc repository
allFileNames first.

lista do: [ :fn| version := mcc repository loadVersionFromFileNamed: fn.
version load]

Still I need the previous Seaside and the previous DinamicBindings, could
say which link?

Many thanks in advance.

Edgar

Bert Freudenberg

Re: [squeak-dev] Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de>

On 02.09.2009, at 13:25, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

>
>
>
> On 9/2/09 6:18 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 02.09.2009, at 10:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>>> I restarted it.
>>>
>>> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.
>>
>> And to any Seaside developer: would be awesome if you could get
>> squeaksource working on a trunk image. Code is here:
>>
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/ss.html
>>
>> - Bert -
>
>
> Hi Bert , I wish try with my own trunk derived image.
>
> I looking and stupid quick script could be.
>
>
> | mcc version lista |
> mcc := MCWorkingCopyBrowser new repository: (MCHttpRepository
> location:
> 'http://www.squeaksource.com/ss' user: '' password: '').
> lista := mcc repository allFileNames copyWithout: mcc repository
> allFileNames first.
>
> lista do: [ :fn| version := mcc repository loadVersionFromFileNamed:
> fn.
> version load]
>
> Still I need the previous Seaside and the previous DinamicBindings,
> could
> say which link?
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
> Edgar

I don't know, that's one of the reasons I was asking for help ;)

- Bert -

Ken Causey-3

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - 502 bad gateway

In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg

On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:55 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> I restarted it.
>
> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.
>
> - Bert -

Done.

Ken

signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment

Edgar J. De Cleene

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg

On 9/2/09 6:18 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:

I try to build the image with the last I have, but several files in ss was
not in the repository.

The incomplete list of missing files is:
Atom-pmm.10.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/Atom-pmm.10.mcz>
SOAP-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/SOAP-pmm.1.mcz>
ODBC-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/ODBC-pmm.1.mcz>

Also for build with all files in the repository, the following was needed:
FFI-Kernel-ar.7.mcz for load GraphViz
Complete Connectors for dependencies in GraphBuilder

When loading 'SqueakSource-bf.1042', I have
'This package depends on the following classes:
TWWiki
You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these
definitions:
SSWiki
SSWiki>>actions
SSWiki>>onSaved
SSWiki>>project
SSWiki>>setModel:
SSWiki>>style
'

If any help me , maybe I could complete the image and test.

Edgar

Bert Freudenberg

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

On 10.09.2009, at 13:46, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

>
>
>
> On 9/2/09 6:18 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 02.09.2009, at 10:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>>> I restarted it.
>>>
>>> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.
>>
>> And to any Seaside developer: would be awesome if you could get
>> squeaksource working on a trunk image. Code is here:
>>
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/ss.html
>>
>> - Bert -
>
>
> I try to build the image with the last I have, but several files in
> ss was
> not in the repository.
>
> The incomplete list of missing files is:
> Atom-pmm.10.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/Atom-pmm.10.mcz>
> SOAP-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/SOAP-pmm.1.mcz>
> ODBC-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/ODBC-pmm.1.mcz>

Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but
AFAICT they are not used.

> Also for build with all files in the repository, the following was
> needed:
> FFI-Kernel-ar.7.mcz for load GraphViz
> Complete Connectors for dependencies in GraphBuilder
>
> When loading 'SqueakSource-bf.1042', I have
> 'This package depends on the following classes:
> TWWiki

That comes from TinyWiki which is in the repo.

Did you see Andreas' mail? He succeeded to load it into a trunk image.
I was just too busy to follow up on that yet.

- Bert -

Philippe Marschall

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

2009/9/10 Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>:

>
> On 10.09.2009, at 13:46, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/2/09 6:18 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02.09.2009, at 10:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> I restarted it.
>>>>
>>>> Ken: you should re-enable the daemontools launcher for it.
>>>
>>> And to any Seaside developer: would be awesome if you could get
>>> squeaksource working on a trunk image. Code is here:
>>>
>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/ss.html
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>> I try to build the image with the last I have, but several files in ss was
>> not in the repository.
>>
>> The incomplete list of missing files is:
>> Atom-pmm.10.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/Atom-pmm.10.mcz>
>> SOAP-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/SOAP-pmm.1.mcz>
>> ODBC-pmm.1.mcz <http://www.squeaksource.com/ss/ODBC-pmm.1.mcz>
>
> Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but AFAICT
> they are not used.

You're right. Dunno why they're there and have my initials.

Cheers
Philippe

Edgar J. De Cleene

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg

On 9/10/09 12:32 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but
> AFAICT they are not used.
Ok, and thanks to Phillipe also.
What I mean is the files can't be loaded because NOT in this repository.
> Did you see Andreas' mail? He succeeded to load it into a trunk image.
> I was just too busy to follow up on that yet.

No, I afraid I miss Andreas mail.
I never build a Squeaksource image before, so I look in repositories all
files which seems needed.
When I try WaKom startOn: 8080 have some complain referring to
BlockClosures, but if this was solved, ok, no follow this path

Edgazr

Bert Freudenberg

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

On 10.09.2009, at 20:55, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> On 9/10/09 12:32 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but
>> AFAICT they are not used.
> Ok, and thanks to Phillipe also.
> What I mean is the files can't be loaded because NOT in this
> repository.

Ah, maybe the files are missing then and only the meta data preserved.

>> Did you see Andreas' mail? He succeeded to load it into a trunk
>> image.
>> I was just too busy to follow up on that yet.
>
> No, I afraid I miss Andreas mail.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Andreas Raab <[hidden email]>
> Date: 6. September 2009 20:53:43 MESZ
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <[hidden email]
> >
> Cc: Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: source.squeak.org down again
> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <[hidden email]
> >
>
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> I just added you as developer on source.squeak.org.
>
> Thanks. If you take a fully updated trunk image, you can load SS
> using the SSLoader configuration map on source.squeak.org. Once
> loaded, you can launch SS via:
>
> SSRepository classPool at: #Current
> put: SSRepository defaultRepository.
> SSRepository classPool at: #Storage
> put: SSRepository defaultStorage.
> SSRepository current rootUrl: 'http://localhost:9090/'.
> SSRepository startUp.
>
> (btw, where are the mutators for Current/Storage?)
>
>> And the squeaksource.com repo is open to anybody.
>
> Thanks but I don't want to mess things up (i.e., break stuff in 3.7
> etc) in case there are people still interested in it. I feel more
> comfortable messing up things at source.squeak.org since we only
> need to maintain the version that we're planning to run ;-)
>
>> Has anyone ever migrated a largish source repository to a new
>> image? Anything to watch out for?
>
> Since we have so few projects we could just import all the files
> again. We did this when we switched to Gemstone at work and it
> worked all right.
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>

Edgar J. De Cleene

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

Sorry by bring this again, but...
I resize the pict , but still is too big for this list so..

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/cb1b7e9495.jpg

Shows I was able to have squeaksource running in my SqueakLight.
And fail to have squeaksource running with the last trunk image, as the
walkback said

As Bert and Andreas point, the files I use was

| loader |
loader _ CodeLoader new.
loader baseURL:'http://source.squeak.org/ss/'.
loader installMonticelloFor: #
('DynamicBindings-ar.2.mcz' 'KomServices-lr.3.mcz'
'KomHttpServer-ar.8.mcz' 'SmaCC-md.9.mcz' 'XML-Parser-mir.9.mcz'
'Seaside2-ar.97.mcz' 'Mewa-pmm.16.mcz' 'TinyWiki-pmm.11.mcz'
'SqueakSource-ar.1043.mcz')

SSRepository classPool at: #Current
put: SSRepository defaultRepository.
SSRepository classPool at: #Storage
put: SSRepository defaultStorage.
SSRepository current rootUrl: 'http://localhost:9090/'.
SSRepository startUp.

The files I see using Monticello Browser is different of files in Firefox
listing, why is this ?

Any I doing wrong or is a trunk bug ?

Edgar

SqueakDebug.log (5K) Download Attachment

Levente Uzonyi-2

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

Hi!

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

> Any I doing wrong or is a trunk bug ?

DynamicBindings-ar.2.mcz doesn't support BlockClosures, that's why it
doesn't work. You need DynamicBindings-damiencassou.9.mcz or newer from
http://www.squeaksource.com/KomHttpServer.html . You can also try copying
the methods from BlockContext and ContextPart to BlockClosure if you want
to use these old packages, but i'm pretty sure you're going to have other
problems in trunk with these.

Cheers,
Levente

Edgar J. De Cleene

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org - help needed

On 9/17/09 8:32 PM, "UZONYI Levente" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
>> Any I doing wrong or is a trunk bug ?
>
> DynamicBindings-ar.2.mcz doesn't support BlockClosures, that's why it
> doesn't work. You need DynamicBindings-damiencassou.9.mcz or newer from
> http://www.squeaksource.com/KomHttpServer.html . You can also try copying
> the methods from BlockContext and ContextPart to BlockClosure if you want
> to use these old packages, but i'm pretty sure you're going to have other
> problems in trunk with these.
>
> Cheers,
> Levente

Thanks , is a very useful clue.
Before I made the try think in use the last files Giovanni announce
DynamicBindings-GiovanniCorriga.10.mcz
- KomServices-gc.19.mcz
- KomHttpServer-GiovanniCorriga.50.mcz

Also thinking in copying the methods you said, but still my understanding of
Closures is not as should be :=)

Thanks again and I share what found.

Edgar

Ole Voß

Monticello HTTPS

In reply to this post by Edgar J. De Cleene

Hello everybody,

I'm a Perl programmer by trade and have been looking into Smalltalk during my spare time. At work we use svn as our code repository with all the transactions encrypted via HTTPS. Currently I cannot find anything on how to do secure SCM via HTTPS (or SFTP or something similar) using Monticello. Am I just plain blind or is that indeed not an option?

I'm curious as to how a company would protect it's source using Smalltalk when the developers are not all set up to dial in via e.g. VPN. Maybe somebody could give me a hint as to how a company would realize a secure distributed development repository? Or is Monticello not the right choice in this case?

Many regards,

Ole.

Levente Uzonyi-2

Re: Monticello HTTPS

On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Ole Voß wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm a Perl programmer by trade and have been looking into Smalltalk during my spare time. At work we use svn as our code repository with all the transactions encrypted via HTTPS. Currently I cannot find anything on how to do secure SCM via HTTPS (or SFTP or something similar) using Monticello. Am I just plain blind or is that indeed not an option?

Try this: http://www.squeaksource.com/monticellossl.html . If it doesn't
work for you, there's an alternative, but that needs a bit polishing.

>
> I'm curious as to how a company would protect it's source using Smalltalk when the developers are not all set up to dial in via e.g. VPN. Maybe somebody could give me a hint as to how a company would realize a secure distributed development repository? Or is Monticello not the right choice in this case?
>

We are tunneling our connections to the server with ssh.

Levente

> Many regards,
>
> Ole.
>