Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

squeak.org/source.squeak.org look down

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Chris Cunnington

squeak.org/source.squeak.org look down

It appears squeak.org and other sites (i.e. archive page for Squeak-dev)
are hung/down. I intended to reboot the server with "shutdown -r now" in
a little less than an hour. I'm leaving a window so that if somebody has
a more appropriate procedure, then they can take over. It's 10:12am here
and I intend to reboot at 11am. That's my plan. If that sounds like a
bad idea, let me know before then.

Chris

Chris Cunnington

squeak.org/source.squeak.org back up

All systems back up.

On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:

> (Moved to box-admins).
>
> Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great.
> But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more
> than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything
> back up and running.
>
> Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and
> 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
>
>

No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to
try it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to
know."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk

Chris

Chris Muller-3

Re: squeak.org/source.squeak.org back up

Heh, ok. If none of the systems are responsive anyway seems like a
reboot couldn't hurt. Thanks for taking care of it.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Chris Cunnington
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> All systems back up.
>
>
>
> On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
>>
>> (Moved to box-admins).
>>
>> Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great.
>> But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more
>> than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything
>> back up and running.
>>
>> Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and
>> 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
>>
>>
> No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to try
> it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to know."
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk
>
> Chris
>

Ken Causey-3

Re: squeak.org/source.squeak.org back up

In reply to this post by Chris Cunnington

On 12/28/2012 10:16 AM, Chris Cunnington wrote:

>
> All systems back up.
>
>
>
> On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
>> (Moved to box-admins).
>>
>> Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great.
>> But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more
>> than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything
>> back up and running.
>>
>> Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and
>> 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
>>
>>
> No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to
> try it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to
> know."
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk
>
> Chris

Thanks. I would have appreciated the opportunity to take a look first,
but I wasn't available, so be it.

Ken