http://box3.squeak.org:8624/
I killed the old process which had been up for 430 hours. It had been posted on The Weekly Squeak and I never saw it go down. So, I'm thinking Altitude is pretty stable. I removed the large Take Part In The Innovation (TPITI) section and made it one of the six smaller ones. I added two links (i.e. World Of Smalltalk and Planet Squeak) to the Smalltalk Blogs. I think Hannes wins this round. The TPITI looks better as a smaller section, which allows the entire page to be seen without scrolling downward. Chris |
Here's an article that might help.
I'm not sure I totally agree. But, it's worth testing. One point I get from the article is that the "call to action" should be clearly identifiable as separate from the rest of the text copy.
I'm also a proponent for the visual flow concept. The page tells a story ... a story about the site visitor (or the site visitor's future self).
Do we know (or guess at) what a first time site visitor's internal questions are? And what the answers are? Do we know (or guess at) what a frequent site visitor's internal questions are? And what the answers are?
- Darius On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Chris Cunnington <[hidden email]> wrote: http://box3.squeak.org:8624/ |
Let me know what you think of these sites as examples of ideas (not to copy per say. just ideas of what questions these web pages answer):
- Darius
|
On 2012-12-06 3:58 PM, Darius Clarke
wrote:
Let me know what you think of these sites as examples of ideas (not to copy per say. just ideas of what questions these web pages answer):First to consider your first email. I don't think we're going to have a scroll down fold, so it's not a big issue anymore. The thing we want people to do is download, which is going to be the top left panel of the six, so it should be easy to see. These three sites look similar and were likely made with a similar template. They have a horizontal layout. They look sort of busy, which is good. Lots of little details but no mooring focus. You look left and right a lot. I think the layout we have at the moment fans out from the upper left corner, so it has a focus and motion fanning outward. What those sites do have is a dynamic use of color. And one has a great background graphic. Maybe the bar across the top of our site needn't be black. It could be a darker hue of a color in the background. The emberjs.com and SproutCore sites do that well. Maybe we could have cobalt blue bar at the top and background of a lighter shade of blue. Chris |
Chris,
Thank you for the new version. On 12/6/12, Chris Cunnington <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 2012-12-06 3:58 PM, Darius Clarke wrote: >> Let me know what you think of these sites as examples of ideas (not to >> copy per say. just ideas of what questions these web pages answer): >> >> http://sproutcore.com/ >> http://emberjs.com/ >> >> http://www.squarespace.com/ >> >> - Darius >> > First to consider your first email. I don't think we're going to have a > scroll down fold, so it's not a big issue anymore. The thing we want > people to do is download, which is going to be the top left panel of the > six, so it should be easy to see. > > These three sites look similar and were likely made with a similar > template. They have a horizontal layout. They look sort of busy, which > is good. Lots of little details but no mooring focus. You look left and > right a lot. > > I think the layout we have at the moment fans out from the upper left > corner, so it has a focus and motion fanning outward. What those sites > do have is a dynamic use of color. And one has a great background graphic. > Maybe the bar across the top of our site needn't be black. It could be a > darker hue of a color in the background. The emberjs.com and SproutCore > sites do that well. Maybe we could have cobalt blue bar at the top and > background of a lighter shade of blue. +1 --Hannes Squeak2012-12-06-Website.PNG (90K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |