) is fairly informative.. and i will keep digging around. I have been
version of squeak to get, etc.
> Thanks for the reply Bryce.
>
> There are a lot of references scattered around... and I am at a loss
> just getting started. Could you please point me to the best, latest
> documentation? I did read your recent release note, and last winter
> I watched a presentation of yours.
>
> I am fairly new to squeak & pharo and I have not yet generated the
> VM's C code -- i don't where to begin to do that.
> --
> I am amazed, given the speed of these new computers, that squeak and
> pharo "feel sluggish" at all.
>
> Also... are these current VM's 64 bit? And, is it easy to see the
> FFI code once I have generated the C?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Cam
>
> On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Bryce Kampjes wrote:
>
>> Exupery itself may need a little more work before it's providing a
>> practical performance improvement. It can speed up real code now,
>> and it
>> will do better with a little tuning of the profiler that drives
>> compilation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Exupery mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery