> That would be great.
> "proceed" when loading does not work.
Installer package for doing such things.
> those not having installed Package Universes).
Yes, more independence would be appreciated.
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:00 , Gary Chambers wrote:
>
>> If there is sufficient interest I could break out the window icon
>> methods
>> into a separate package (with the implicit dependencies).
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:
[hidden email]
>>> [mailto:
[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Adrian
>>> Lienhard
>>> Sent: 18 February 2008 8:19 AM
>>> To: Squeak's User Interface
>>> Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements??
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Damien,
>>>
>>> The reason is that I want to add this enhancement to our automated
>>> build process. Compared to production images, dev images have some
>>> additional packages. But I only want to add what we really need, e.g.,
>>> OmniBrowser, Shout, eCompletion but not Package Universes or YAXO.
>>> Also, I want to have everything in MC packages as the build process is
>>> based on MC configurations.
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2008, at 08:00 , Damien Cassou wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>>
>>>> why don't you simply install Universe (available on both SqueakMap and
>>>> SqueakSource) and then, from Universe, install UIEnhancements? You
>>>> can also download a squeak-dev image based on 3.9 (without
>>>> UIEnhancements) and install UIEnhancements from Universe?
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 17, 2008 11:38 PM, Adrian Lienhard <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the
>>>>> package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its
>>>>> not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would
>>>>> be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Adrian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill Schwab wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything
>>>>>>> installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am
>>>>>>> giving an
>>>>>>> introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic
>>>>>>> stuff),
>>>>>>> and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside
>>>>>> in dev
>>>>>> images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements
>>>>>> enabled.
>>>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with
>>>>>> the UI
>>>>>> enhancements making it look pretty?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr
>>>>>> Seaside and
>>>>>> the UI enhancements are orthogonal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>
http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p15532405.html>>>>> Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> UI mailing list
>>>>>
[hidden email]
>>>>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> UI mailing list
>>>>
[hidden email]
>>>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Damien Cassou
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UI mailing list
>>>
[hidden email]
>>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UI mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UI mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui