Login  Register

Re: Another convention?

Posted by Mariano Martinez Peck on Dec 10, 2011; 2:00pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/Another-convention-tp4178690p4180227.html

Excellent. Thanks Dale.

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mariano,

that makes a lot of sense ... I'll add a bug report on this ...

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[hidden email]>
| To: [hidden email]
| Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 3:22:07 PM
| Subject: [Metacello] Another convention?
|
| Hi Dale. The other day we were discussing with Stef that it is common
| that if you have your repository called XXX then you have the
| ConfigurationOfXXX class in the package ConfigurationOfXX. In such a
| case, the #className: could be also optional if you follow that
| convention. What I mean is that I would like to do:
|
| spec project: 'Fuel' with: [
| spec
| repository: ' http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Fuel ' ].
|
|
| or
|
| spec project: 'Fuel' with: [
| spec
| repository: ' http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Fuel ' .
| versionString: #'bleedingEdge
| ]
|
|
|
| What do you think? come on come on! you can do it ;)
|
| cheers
|
|
| --
| Mariano
| http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
|
|



--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com