Posted by
Casey Ransberger-2 on
Mar 08, 2012; 8:53pm
URL: https://forum.world.st/SOB-minutes-3-6-12-tp4453817p4457629.html
I shipped Squeak once, but my code contributions to Squeak mainline have been minimal.
I recommend continuing the practice of allowing anyone who voted last time to vote again.
It's worth noting that I agree with Mr. Cunningham. I think end users, not just developers, should also have a voice.
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Chris Cunningham <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 3/7/12 2:57 PM, "Chris Cunnington" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> * a person would be eligible to vote by having shown they¹d made a
>>> contribution
>>
>>
>> I think the list should be SqueakSource members who have at less one project
>> and this was active in the last year.
>>
> This is a great rule to include someone, but shouldn't be our only rule.
>
> What about people who have directly added to the trunk (either via
> committing directly, or to the inbox?) What about people who help
> with documentation?
>
> Heck, what about lurkers that just use Squeak, and want to have a
> chance to weigh in on a board that aligns with how they want Squeak to
> go forward in the future (which is, more or less, where I fall)?
>
> -Chris
>