Hi All,
I've screwed up and somehow managed to create an update with the same number as a previous one. You'll see in trunk update update-eem.295.mcm update-ul.295.mcm and in update.spur update.spur-eem.295.mcm update.spur-ul.295.mcm I don't kno how I did this but can some kind authorised soul rename update-eem.295.mcm => update-eem.296.mcm update.spur-eem.295.mcm => update.spur-eem.296.mcm This is playing havoc with updates... -- best,
Eliot |
>>I don't kno how I did this It's quite easy. You and Levante worked off of the same ancestor and committed your work. The names mean no collision. (or, just possibly, you overwrote the number in the title while committing - I've done that, but usually with a comment instead of a number). In either case, I could see how it would cause update to be unhappy. Was ul's version an ancestor of yours, or are you skipping over it? On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Eliot Miranda-2
Hi Eliot,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Eliot Miranda wrote: > Hi All, > I've screwed up and somehow managed to create an update with the same number as a previous one. You'll see in trunk update I guess you created the new .mcm before updating your image, otherwise the version number would have get bumped automatically. > > update-eem.295.mcm > update-ul.295.mcm > > and in update.spur > > update.spur-eem.295.mcm > update.spur-ul.295.mcm > > I don't kno how I did this but can some kind authorised soul rename > update-eem.295.mcm => update-eem.296.mcm > update.spur-eem.295.mcm => update.spur-eem.296.mcm Board group. So you should be able to log in to source.squeak.org, and if the .mcm files are exposed to the web interface (hopefully), then you should be able to move/delete them. I think there's no rename feature. If so, the the easiest way to fix this is to reupload the eem.295 versions as eem.296, and then delete the eem.295 ones from the web interface. Levente > > This is playing havoc with updates... > -- > best,Eliot > > |
In reply to this post by cbc
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email]> wrote:
Looking at the version numbers, Levente's comes first.
best,
Eliot |
In reply to this post by Levente Uzonyi-2
Hi Levente,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Eliot, I'm trying to login with my trunk credentials but am rebuffed. I think there's no rename feature. If so, the the easiest way to fix this is to reupload the eem.295 versions as eem.296, and then delete the eem.295 ones from the web interface. OK, will do. Once I can login. David, any help there?
best,
Eliot |
>
>> I think there's no rename feature. If so, the the easiest way to fix >> this >> is to reupload the eem.295 versions as eem.296, and then delete the >> eem.295 >> ones from the web interface. > > > OK, will do. Once I can login. David, any help there? > I am way behind on email. You want me to delete update-eem.295 from trunk, right? Dave |
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:08 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > and update.spur-eem.295, yes. Or, tell me how to login to source.squeak.org (my trunk credentials don't work) and I'll do it myself. Levente says all SOB members should be allowed to login but I don't know which credentials to use. best,
Eliot |
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:08 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]>
> wrote: > >> > >> >> I think there's no rename feature. If so, the the easiest way to fix >> >> this >> >> is to reupload the eem.295 versions as eem.296, and then delete the >> >> eem.295 >> >> ones from the web interface. >> > >> > >> > OK, will do. Once I can login. David, any help there? >> > >> >> I am way behind on email. You want me to delete update-eem.295 from >> trunk, >> right? >> > > and update.spur-eem.295, yes. I am away and I cannot do any updates. I can get at the web page to delete the old file if you want, but that's all I'm able to do right now. > > Or, tell me how to login to source.squeak.org (my trunk credentials don't > work) and I'll do it myself. Levente says all SOB members should be > allowed to login but I don't know which credentials to use. I'm not sure what's wrong. The web site should accept your author initials and password, exactly as in your MC browser. The site claims that you should have access, so I'm not sure why it's not letting you in. Dave |
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: -- > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:08 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> got it. excuse the noise. best,
Eliot |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |