trying to load metacello

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

trying to load metacello

Tudor Girba
Hi,

I am trying to load all packages of Metacello version 1.0-beta.27.4, including the tests, but I somehow cannot.

If I do:
(ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.27.4') record loadDirective

I get only:

linear load :
        linear load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
                load : ConfigurationOfGofer
        atomic load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
                linear load : 1.0.2.1 [ConfigurationOfGofer]
                        load : Gofer-Core-dkh.121
                load : Metacello-Core-DaleHenrichs.366
                load : Metacello-MC-DaleHenrichs.428
                load : Metacello-Platform.pharo-DaleHenrichs.16


I cannot understand why the rest of the packages are not listed. What am I doing wrong?

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: trying to load metacello

Dale Henrichs
Doru,

when you #record, you get the default packages loaded , which is what
you are seeing ... if you want the whole enchilada do this:

   ((ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.27.4')
     record: 'ALL') loadDirective

The arguments to #record:, #fetch: and #load: are the same ...

BTW, I am moments from announcing 1.0-beta.27.5 which has the sortBy:
methods replaced with Sort: to avoid deprecation warnings in Pharo1.2...

Dale


On 11/11/2010 12:18 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am trying to load all packages of Metacello version 1.0-beta.27.4, including the tests, but I somehow cannot.
>
> If I do:
> (ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.27.4') record loadDirective
>
> I get only:
>
> linear load :
> linear load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
> load : ConfigurationOfGofer
> atomic load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
> linear load : 1.0.2.1 [ConfigurationOfGofer]
> load : Gofer-Core-dkh.121
> load : Metacello-Core-DaleHenrichs.366
> load : Metacello-MC-DaleHenrichs.428
> load : Metacello-Platform.pharo-DaleHenrichs.16
>
>
> I cannot understand why the rest of the packages are not listed. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: trying to load metacello

Tudor Girba
Ohh, now I see. There is a 'default' group in the baseline that I missed. Thanks.

Cheers,
Doru


On 11 Nov 2010, at 22:37, Dale Henrichs wrote:

> Doru,
>
> when you #record, you get the default packages loaded , which is what you are seeing ... if you want the whole enchilada do this:
>
>  ((ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.27.4')
>    record: 'ALL') loadDirective
>
> The arguments to #record:, #fetch: and #load: are the same ...
>
> BTW, I am moments from announcing 1.0-beta.27.5 which has the sortBy: methods replaced with Sort: to avoid deprecation warnings in Pharo1.2...
>
> Dale
>
>
> On 11/11/2010 12:18 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to load all packages of Metacello version 1.0-beta.27.4, including the tests, but I somehow cannot.
>>
>> If I do:
>> (ConfigurationOfMetacello project version: '1.0-beta.27.4') record loadDirective
>>
>> I get only:
>>
>> linear load :
>> linear load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
>> load : ConfigurationOfGofer
>> atomic load : 1.0-beta.27.4 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
>> linear load : 1.0.2.1 [ConfigurationOfGofer]
>> load : Gofer-Core-dkh.121
>> load : Metacello-Core-DaleHenrichs.366
>> load : Metacello-MC-DaleHenrichs.428
>> load : Metacello-Platform.pharo-DaleHenrichs.16
>>
>>
>> I cannot understand why the rest of the packages are not listed. What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
>>
>>
>>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."