upThrough:

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

upThrough:

Eliot Miranda-2
Hi All,

   when and why did upThrough: get deleted from the ReadStream hierarchy?  Are there strong reasons against reinstating it?  This is extremely useful :-(

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upThrough:

marcel.taeumel
Hi Eliot,

I went back up to Squeak 3.6 -- couldn't find it. I assume that you do not refer to the still existing SequenceableCollection >> #copyUpThrough:?

Best,
Marcel

Am 09.03.2018 12:09:29 schrieb Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>:

Hi All,

   when and why did upThrough: get deleted from the ReadStream hierarchy?  Are there strong reasons against reinstating it?  This is extremely useful :-(

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upThrough:

Eliot Miranda-2
Hi Marcel,

On Mar 9, 2018, at 4:29 PM, Marcel Taeumel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Eliot,

I went back up to Squeak 3.6 -- couldn't find it. I assume that you do not refer to the still existing SequenceableCollection >> #copyUpThrough:?

No, it's the stream method.  It's in VisualWorks.  I shall add it :-)


Best,
Marcel

Am 09.03.2018 12:09:29 schrieb Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>:

Hi All,

   when and why did upThrough: get deleted from the ReadStream hierarchy?  Are there strong reasons against reinstating it?  This is extremely useful :-(

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot