Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ...
In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris 8/5/2010 15:51'
Cheers,
Sean |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes
Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on the ring meta model > Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that. > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... > > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris > 8/5/2010 15:51' > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Steph,
I would love to help you with ... I'm overloaded like everyone else, but would squeeze out time for this if it makes sense ... Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> | To: [hidden email] | Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:53:36 AM | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Are we losing method versions? | | yes | | Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on | the ring meta model | | | | > Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That | > should explain that. | > | > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris | > <[hidden email]> wrote: | > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... | > | > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 | > 01:10' | > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: | > "#('SeanDeNigris | > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" | > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: | > 'SeanDeNigris | > 8/5/2010 15:51' | > | > -- | > View this message in context: | > http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html | > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | > | > | | | |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On May 16, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Steph, > > I would love to help you with ... I'm overloaded like everyone else, but would squeeze out time for this if it makes sense … Thanks dale. Hernan and one of his students started to work on a solution (not ring based) and we synced now in Sept we will receive him for three months and I hope to get some momentum. I will ask veronica and andy to let us know about their first experience. > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> > | To: [hidden email] > | Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:53:36 AM > | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Are we losing method versions? > | > | yes > | > | Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on > | the ring meta model > | > | > | > | > Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That > | > should explain that. > | > > | > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris > | > <[hidden email]> wrote: > | > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... > | > > | > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 > | > 01:10' > | > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: > | > "#('SeanDeNigris > | > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" > | > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: > | > 'SeanDeNigris > | > 8/5/2010 15:51' > | > > | > -- > | > View this message in context: > | > http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html > | > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > | > > | > > | > | > | > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
Magma 1.3 runs on Pharo 1.3. Did anyone ever get a chance try Magma's
new capability in this area? http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5603 Of course you get all versions, but I myself have been really enjoying "Browse mc origin" which it adds to the method menu -- it opens the standard MCVersionInfo box to see the version notes for when that version of the method was originally created. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > yes > > Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on the ring meta model > > > >> Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that. >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >> For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... >> >> In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' >> In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris >> 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" >> In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris >> 8/5/2010 15:51' >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Sean P. DeNigris
On May 16, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... > > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris > 8/5/2010 15:51' > Yes, we did a condense sources in 1.4. The .sources file reached 40MB. (condensed 12). Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3
Cool I should try.
Should I install Magma locally? Can I automatically publish in magma local and squeak source/ss3/... On May 17, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Chris Muller wrote: > Magma 1.3 runs on Pharo 1.3. Did anyone ever get a chance try Magma's > new capability in this area? > > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5603 > > Of course you get all versions, but I myself have been really enjoying > "Browse mc origin" which it adds to the method menu -- it opens the > standard MCVersionInfo box to see the version notes for when that > version of the method was originally created. > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> yes >> >> Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on the ring meta model >> >> >> >>> Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that. >>> >>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... >>> >>> In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' >>> In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris >>> 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" >>> In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris >>> 8/5/2010 15:51' >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Those MC upgrades which I think you ported over are needed.
Using a remote connection is recommended, because a local connection would lock files and wouldn't be able to access multiple images simultaneously. > Can I automatically publish in magma local and squeak source/ss3/... It is just a MC repository -- it _could_ be used as a back-end for SqueakSource, but I don't believe that has been done. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > Cool I should try. > Should I install Magma locally? > Can I automatically publish in magma local and squeak source/ss3/... > > On May 17, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Chris Muller wrote: > >> Magma 1.3 runs on Pharo 1.3. Did anyone ever get a chance try Magma's >> new capability in this area? >> >> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5603 >> >> Of course you get all versions, but I myself have been really enjoying >> "Browse mc origin" which it adds to the method menu -- it opens the >> standard MCVersionInfo box to see the version notes for when that >> version of the method was originally created. >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> yes >>> >>> Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on the ring meta model >>> >>> >>> >>>> Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... >>>> >>>> In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' >>>> In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris >>>> 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" >>>> In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris >>>> 8/5/2010 15:51' >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On May 17, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Chris Muller wrote: > Those MC upgrades which I think you ported over are needed. Not yet. I have to get the time to be really concentrated. > > Using a remote connection is recommended, because a local connection > would lock files and wouldn't be able to access multiple images > simultaneously. > >> Can I automatically publish in magma local and squeak source/ss3/... > > It is just a MC repository -- it _could_ be used as a back-end for > SqueakSource, but I don't believe that has been done. > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Cool I should try. >> Should I install Magma locally? >> Can I automatically publish in magma local and squeak source/ss3/... >> >> On May 17, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Chris Muller wrote: >> >>> Magma 1.3 runs on Pharo 1.3. Did anyone ever get a chance try Magma's >>> new capability in this area? >>> >>> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5603 >>> >>> Of course you get all versions, but I myself have been really enjoying >>> "Browse mc origin" which it adds to the method menu -- it opens the >>> standard MCVersionInfo box to see the version notes for when that >>> version of the method was originally created. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> yes >>>> >>>> Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on the ring meta model >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That should explain that. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... >>>>> >>>>> In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 01:10' >>>>> In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: "#('SeanDeNigris >>>>> 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" >>>>> In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: 'SeanDeNigris >>>>> 8/5/2010 15:51' >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html >>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> ... [show rest of quote] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |