ProcessBrowser does not auto-update itself by default? Should it?

> On 4 Feb 2019, at 11:47, Thomas Dupriez <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Process Browser does not auto-updates itself by default to show new processes and hide processes that stopped.
>
> Is there a specific reason for that? The first time I opened it I kind of expected it would auto-update itself, and I think this may be a more "intuitive" behaviour that no auto-updates by default. What do you think?
>
> Getting auto-updates is "easy" (there is no button in the UI (something to improve?), but one can call the "toggleAutoUpdate" method to get this behaviour). My question is about it not being default.
>
> Thomas
>
>

>
> I believe the reason not to make auto updating the default, is because #updateProcessList is a bit heavy (it calls a GC, does an #allSubInstances, and it is a thread itself). Maybe that is no longer the case ?
>
> But adding a button to make auto updating easier to start would probably help.
>
> Maybe a button bar for more common actions (like terminate) ?
>
> > On 4 Feb 2019, at 11:47, Thomas Dupriez <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Process Browser does not auto-updates itself by default to show new processes and hide processes that stopped.
> >
> > Is there a specific reason for that? The first time I opened it I kind of expected it would auto-update itself, and I think this may be a more "intuitive" behaviour that no auto-updates by default. What do you think?
> >
> > Getting auto-updates is "easy" (there is no button in the UI (something to improve?), but one can call the "toggleAutoUpdate" method to get this behaviour). My question is about it not being default.

> On 4 Feb 2019, at 11:47, Thomas Dupriez <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Process Browser does not auto-updates itself by default to show new processes and hide processes that stopped.
>
> Is there a specific reason for that? The first time I opened it I kind of expected it would auto-update itself, and I think this may be a more "intuitive" behaviour that no auto-updates by default. What do you think?
>
> Getting auto-updates is "easy" (there is no button in the UI (something to improve?), but one can call the "toggleAutoUpdate" method to get this behaviour). My question is about it not being default.
>
> Thomas
>
>