[ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
75 messages Options
1234
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

Andreas.Raab
tim Rowledge wrote:
> Yup, editing categories and even editing the system organisation results
> in no input to the changeset. Ooh, even back to 3.8-6665. What fun. And
> 3.7. And 3.6. Well, that's puzzling since I was pretty sure we've filed
> out SystemOrganization edits before now. And it doesn't even get into
> the changes log either. Very odd.

Uhm, to be honest I can't remember that to have ever worked. In those
cases where we did it in the past it was an explicit doIt.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

timrowledge

On 26-Sep-06, at 12:42 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:

> tim Rowledge wrote:
>> Yup, editing categories and even editing the system organisation  
>> results in no input to the changeset. Ooh, even back to 3.8-6665.  
>> What fun. And 3.7. And 3.6. Well, that's puzzling since I was  
>> pretty sure we've filed out SystemOrganization edits before now.  
>> And it doesn't even get into the changes log either. Very odd.
>
> Uhm, to be honest I can't remember that to have ever worked. In  
> those cases where we did it in the past it was an explicit doIt.

Well, you might be right. I can't help feeling that organization  
changes showed up in the filed out changes though; in fact I seem to  
remember them appearing far too often, like twice per fileout.  
Scanning some older .cs files I can find cases where the *class*  
organization has been included in the file, but no evidence to back  
up my suspicion. Class organizer changes do indeed still appear in  
the changeset.

There is a SystemOrganization>fileOut method that appears to work  
(although for some reason making a file 'SystemOrganization.
1.st.st' !) and maybe that was hooked up at some point.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful Latin Phrases:- Oblitus sum perpolire clepsydras! = I forgot  
to polish the clocks!



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final

Brad Fuller
In reply to this post by timrowledge
tim Rowledge wrote:

>
> On 25-Sep-06, at 1:42 PM, Brad Fuller wrote:
>
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>>> been an VM ignorant I cannot reply. Now I hope that this bug can
>>>>> be fixed for 3.9 VMs
>>>>> It seems to me that from an image perspective we can safely
>>>>> release the image.
>>>>> Now we should also move, so that people migrate their code on 3.9
>>>>> and that we start
>>>>> on 3.10 :)
>>>> Thanks for your comment, Stef. That seems reasonable. However, are
>>>> you sure that it's a VM issue? The VM crashes, but can it not be an
>>>> issue from higher up?
>>>
>>> Of course it can. But what can we do? do we have reproduceable bugs.
>>> I do not think so.
>> The code is in the mantis defect that is 100% reproducible on my PC.
>> I think it's easy to duplicate or make other PCs crash.
>>
>>> So we can stop 3.9 and postpone it but
>>> I'm pretty sure it will not help.
>> I think what you are saying is that 3.9 should be pushed forward
>> because there are few people to look at this problem. If this is the
>> case, a couple of comments to that:
>
> It doesn't affect my G5 mac so far. I have to say, 16 million float
> additions in 61 mS is damn fast.
>
> It would be helpful if someone could build a PC vm with a small change
> in the code that prints the callstack after a problem like this so
> that it doesn't cast the context address to a signed value before
> printing it. I'm puzzled by the apparently large jump to
> -2128068388 HandMorph>handleEvent:
> -2128068768 MouseOverHandler>processMouseOver:
> from
> 2032428416 HandMorph>handleEvent:
> 2032428116 HandMorph>processEvents
>
> -2128068768 is 0x81283F60 and 2032428416 is 0x79246580; that's a bit
> more of a difference than the usual 92 byte increment as we build the
> stack sending messages. I don't see anything very odd about the code
> in HandMorph>handleEvent: that would lead me to expect any message
> sending funny business.
>
> In the function printCallStackOf() that you should find in interp.c,
> try changing
> /* end findSelectorOfMethod:forReceiver: */;
>         printNum(ctxt);
>         print(" ");
>         if (!(ctxt == home)) {
> to
> /* end findSelectorOfMethod:forReceiver: */;
>         printf("%X", ctxt);
>         print(" ");
>         if (!(ctxt == home)) {
>
> and see if it can give us the stack in hex.
[bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak
/home/bfuller/projects/squeak/images/Squeak3.9g-7060.image

sweep failed to find exact end of memory

813821F4 Morph>hasDropShadow
81381ABC Morph>fullDrawOn:
81381A60 Canvas>fullDraw:
81381A04 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:
81380A7C [] in Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
813809C4 SequenceableCollection>reverseDo:
813808B0 [] in Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
81380570 Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
81373030 [] in Morph>fullDrawOn:
81372F1C FormCanvas>roundCornersOf:in:during:
81372DC8 Canvas>roundCornersOf:during:
8137146C Morph>fullDrawOn:
81371410 Canvas>fullDraw:
81371358 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:
813710EC [] in WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
81370B94 Rectangle>allAreasOutsideList:startingAt:do:
81370A3C Rectangle>allAreasOutsideList:do:
81370FF0 [] in WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
813709E0 SequenceableCollection>do:
81370A98 WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
81370814 [] in WorldState>displayWorld:submorphs:
813706A4 FormCanvas>roundCornersOf:in:during:
81370648 Canvas>roundCornersOf:during:
81370534 WorldState>displayWorld:submorphs:
813703C4 PasteUpMorph>privateOuterDisplayWorld
813702D8 PasteUpMorph>displayWorld
81370420 [] in WorldState>displayWorldSafely:
8137027C BlockContext>on:do:
81370220 BlockContext>ifError:
813701C4 WorldState>displayWorldSafely:
79332CA0 WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
79332C44 WorldState>doOneCycleFor:
79332BE8 WorldState>doOneSubCycleFor:
79332B8C PasteUpMorph>doOneSubCycle
7932E268 MenuMorph>invokeModalAt:in:allowKeyboard:
7932E20C MenuMorph>invokeModal:
7932E09C MenuMorph>invokeModal
7932C6E0 PluggableTextMorph>yellowButtonActivity:
7932C684 TextMorphForEditView>mouseDown:
7932C628 Morph>handleMouseDown:
7932C5CC MouseButtonEvent>sentTo:
7932C570 Morph>handleEvent:
7932C508 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
7932C484 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
7932C428 Morph>processEvent:using:
7932C3A4 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
7932C320 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
7932C2C4 Morph>processEvent:using:
7932C268 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
7932C20C MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
7932C1B0 Morph>processEvent:using:
7932C12C MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
7932C0D0 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
7932C074 Morph>processEvent:using:
7932C018 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
7932BFBC MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
7932BF50 Morph>processEvent:using:
7932BEF4 PasteUpMorph>processEvent:using:
7932BE3C Morph>processEvent:
7932BDE0 HandMorph>sendEvent:focus:clear:
7932BD84 HandMorph>sendMouseEvent:
7932BCF4 HandMorph>handleEvent:
7932BC18 HandMorph>processEvents
7932BC74 [] in WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
7932BBBC SequenceableCollection>do:
7932BB60 WorldState>handsDo:
7932BB04 WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
7932BAA8 WorldState>doOneCycleFor:
7932BA4C PasteUpMorph>doOneCycle
78F82E24 [] in >spawnNewProcess
78F82EDC [] in BlockContext>newProcess

[bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak -version
3.9-8 #6 Tue Sep 26 15:01:19 PDT 2006 gcc 4.1.1
Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
Linux ives 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma #1 PREEMPT Tue Jul 25
15:06:37 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-8/*.so


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Crash (Un)Reproducibility] [Was: Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final]

Giovanni Corriga
In reply to this post by Milan Zimmermann-2
Il giorno mar, 26/09/2006 alle 09.56 -0400, Milan Zimmermann ha scritto:

> On 2006 September 26 04:23, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
> >
> > Ok, here's mine:
> >
> > [gcorriga@rincewind ~]$ squeak -version
> > 3.9-7 #1 Thu May 18 12:06:33 CEST 2006 gcc 4.1.0
> > Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
> > Linux rincewind 2.6.16-1.2111_FC5.stk16 #1 Mon May 8 10:49:23 EDT 2006
> > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> > default plugin location: /usr/lib/squeak/3.9-7/*.so
> >
> > could this be related to the use of gcc 4.x?
>
> I think Bert said in another reply, this problem is likely due to the kernel
> and/or memory over 2Gb. On this system (where it works) I have 1Gb memory and
> something like 2Gb swap, my kernel=vmlinuz-2.6.11.4-21.13 so I guess it makes
> sense it works here from memory perspectivenot sure about 2.6 kernel.
> Giovanni, do you have over 2GB?

Actually, yes. Anyway, if the workaround suggested by Diego and
confirmed by John works, we shouldn't postpone the 3.9 release: let's
just add a remark in the release notes and worry about fixing the bug
for either 3.9.1 or 3.10.

        Giovanni


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final

Brad Fuller
In reply to this post by Brad Fuller
Brad Fuller wrote:

> tim Rowledge wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't affect my G5 mac so far. I have to say, 16 million float
>> additions in 61 mS is damn fast.
>>
>> It would be helpful if someone could build a PC vm with a small
>> change in the code that prints the callstack after a problem like
>> this so that it doesn't cast the context address to a signed value
>> before printing it. I'm puzzled by the apparently large jump to
>> -2128068388 HandMorph>handleEvent:
>> -2128068768 MouseOverHandler>processMouseOver:
>> from
>> 2032428416 HandMorph>handleEvent:
>> 2032428116 HandMorph>processEvents
>>
>> -2128068768 is 0x81283F60 and 2032428416 is 0x79246580; that's a bit
>> more of a difference than the usual 92 byte increment as we build the
>> stack sending messages. I don't see anything very odd about the code
>> in HandMorph>handleEvent: that would lead me to expect any message
>> sending funny business.
>>
>> In the function printCallStackOf() that you should find in interp.c,
>> try changing
>> /* end findSelectorOfMethod:forReceiver: */;
>>         printNum(ctxt);
>>         print(" ");
>>         if (!(ctxt == home)) {
>> to
>> /* end findSelectorOfMethod:forReceiver: */;
>>         printf("%X", ctxt);
>>         print(" ");
>>         if (!(ctxt == home)) {
>>
>> and see if it can give us the stack in hex.
> [bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak
> /home/bfuller/projects/squeak/images/Squeak3.9g-7060.image
>
> sweep failed to find exact end of memory
>
> 813821F4 Morph>hasDropShadow
> 81381ABC Morph>fullDrawOn:
> 81381A60 Canvas>fullDraw:
> 81381A04 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:
> 81380A7C [] in Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
> 813809C4 SequenceableCollection>reverseDo:
> 813808B0 [] in Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
> 81380570 Morph>drawSubmorphsOn:
> 81373030 [] in Morph>fullDrawOn:
> 81372F1C FormCanvas>roundCornersOf:in:during:
> 81372DC8 Canvas>roundCornersOf:during:
> 8137146C Morph>fullDrawOn:
> 81371410 Canvas>fullDraw:
> 81371358 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:
> 813710EC [] in WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
> 81370B94 Rectangle>allAreasOutsideList:startingAt:do:
> 81370A3C Rectangle>allAreasOutsideList:do:
> 81370FF0 [] in WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
> 813709E0 SequenceableCollection>do:
> 81370A98 WorldState>drawWorld:submorphs:invalidAreasOn:
> 81370814 [] in WorldState>displayWorld:submorphs:
> 813706A4 FormCanvas>roundCornersOf:in:during:
> 81370648 Canvas>roundCornersOf:during:
> 81370534 WorldState>displayWorld:submorphs:
> 813703C4 PasteUpMorph>privateOuterDisplayWorld
> 813702D8 PasteUpMorph>displayWorld
> 81370420 [] in WorldState>displayWorldSafely:
> 8137027C BlockContext>on:do:
> 81370220 BlockContext>ifError:
> 813701C4 WorldState>displayWorldSafely:
> 79332CA0 WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
> 79332C44 WorldState>doOneCycleFor:
> 79332BE8 WorldState>doOneSubCycleFor:
> 79332B8C PasteUpMorph>doOneSubCycle
> 7932E268 MenuMorph>invokeModalAt:in:allowKeyboard:
> 7932E20C MenuMorph>invokeModal:
> 7932E09C MenuMorph>invokeModal
> 7932C6E0 PluggableTextMorph>yellowButtonActivity:
> 7932C684 TextMorphForEditView>mouseDown:
> 7932C628 Morph>handleMouseDown:
> 7932C5CC MouseButtonEvent>sentTo:
> 7932C570 Morph>handleEvent:
> 7932C508 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
> 7932C484 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
> 7932C428 Morph>processEvent:using:
> 7932C3A4 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
> 7932C320 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
> 7932C2C4 Morph>processEvent:using:
> 7932C268 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
> 7932C20C MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
> 7932C1B0 Morph>processEvent:using:
> 7932C12C MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
> 7932C0D0 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
> 7932C074 Morph>processEvent:using:
> 7932C018 MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchMouseDown:with:
> 7932BFBC MorphicEventDispatcher>dispatchEvent:with:
> 7932BF50 Morph>processEvent:using:
> 7932BEF4 PasteUpMorph>processEvent:using:
> 7932BE3C Morph>processEvent:
> 7932BDE0 HandMorph>sendEvent:focus:clear:
> 7932BD84 HandMorph>sendMouseEvent:
> 7932BCF4 HandMorph>handleEvent:
> 7932BC18 HandMorph>processEvents
> 7932BC74 [] in WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
> 7932BBBC SequenceableCollection>do:
> 7932BB60 WorldState>handsDo:
> 7932BB04 WorldState>doOneCycleNowFor:
> 7932BAA8 WorldState>doOneCycleFor:
> 7932BA4C PasteUpMorph>doOneCycle
> 78F82E24 [] in >spawnNewProcess
> 78F82EDC [] in BlockContext>newProcess
>
> [bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak -version
> 3.9-8 #6 Tue Sep 26 15:01:19 PDT 2006 gcc 4.1.1
> Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
> Linux ives 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma #1 PREEMPT Tue Jul 25
> 15:06:37 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-8/*.so
>
>
>
Oh... I should mention:

[bfuller@ives ~]$ free
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        515268     482032      33236          0      14556     130128
-/+ buffers/cache:     337348     177920
Swap:      1048568     104880     943688

I'm below the 2GB proposed issue.

--
brad fuller





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final

timrowledge
In reply to this post by Brad Fuller

On 26-Sep-06, at 3:11 PM, Brad Fuller wrote:

>>
>> and see if it can give us the stack in hex.
> [bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak /home/bfuller/projects/squeak/images/
> Squeak3.9g-7060.image
>
> sweep failed to find exact end of memory
>
> 813821F4 Morph>hasDropShadow
> 81381ABC Morph>fullDrawOn:
> 81381A60 Canvas>fullDraw:
> 81381A04 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:

Thanks Brad. That 128-and-a-bit Mb jump is definitely puzzling.  
That's a lot of allocations between the start of doOneCycleNowFor:  
and displayWorldSafely:

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Rules for Optimization: 1. Don't; 2. (for experts only) Don't Yet




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

Lukas Renggli
In reply to this post by timrowledge
> There is a SystemOrganization>fileOut method that appears to work
> (although for some reason making a file 'SystemOrganization.
> 1.st.st' !) and maybe that was hooked up at some point.

Also it is very important to properly log class renames. There is
something broken in this area as well.

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

stephane ducasse-2
may be rewriting the cs recorder based on MC2 metamodel using  
changenotification would be good.
Now we have underneath all the necessary mechanisms.


>> There is a SystemOrganization>fileOut method that appears to work
>> (although for some reason making a file 'SystemOrganization.
>> 1.st.st' !) and maybe that was hooked up at some point.
>
> Also it is very important to properly log class renames. There is
> something broken in this area as well.
>
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SqueakMap issues (was Re: Squeak map colours)

Lex Spoon
In reply to this post by Göran Krampe
[hidden email] writes:
> Yes, this is an unfortunate situation that I need to go through. The
> problem is that after I introduced the server side cache and SHA
> checksumming apparently lots of releases either were non-available at
> the time I initially populated the cache (which lead to crap files in
> the server cache, and to make things worse - crappy checksums!) OR have
> been unavailable when releases have been registered. I think.

I run into this as well if SqueakMap downloads while the network is
unavailable.  It saves to the file an error message, and so of course
its checksum is wrong.  So, the tool could be more careful about
checking that the HTTP request worked, before saving the file.

Recursive delete on the SqueakMap directories works fine in this case.
You can then restart SqueakMap and it will repopulate its directories
from the network.

I also ran into this when I tried to update the URL of a released
SqueakMap version.  Maybe this is more in the line of what you discuss
with bad cached information on the server.  I ended up bumping the
version number even though the actual file content had not changed.


-Lex


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SqueakMap issues (was Re: Squeak map colours)

Göran Krampe
Hi Lex!

Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> wrote:

> [hidden email] writes:
> > Yes, this is an unfortunate situation that I need to go through. The
> > problem is that after I introduced the server side cache and SHA
> > checksumming apparently lots of releases either were non-available at
> > the time I initially populated the cache (which lead to crap files in
> > the server cache, and to make things worse - crappy checksums!) OR have
> > been unavailable when releases have been registered. I think.
>
> I run into this as well if SqueakMap downloads while the network is
> unavailable.  It saves to the file an error message, and so of course
> its checksum is wrong.  So, the tool could be more careful about
> checking that the HTTP request worked, before saving the file.

Ah. Yes... I will take a look (if I remember :)).
 
> Recursive delete on the SqueakMap directories works fine in this case.
> You can then restart SqueakMap and it will repopulate its directories
> from the network.

Right, but this is the client side cache you are talking about (just so
other non familiar readers follow).

> I also ran into this when I tried to update the URL of a released
> SqueakMap version.  Maybe this is more in the line of what you discuss
> with bad cached information on the server.  I ended up bumping the
> version number even though the actual file content had not changed.

IIRC the current logic is that when the URL of a release is modified -
it will repopulate the server side cache and update the checksum,
Was that what you tried to do? Because I thought that worked.

But just so that any confused reader understand - if the SM server at
that time downloads a "faulty" file - like say an HTTP error message
instead of a sar-file - then from that moment it will end up being very
inhelpful thinking that any subsequent correct download is in fact bad
(checksum fails) and it will fall back on downloading the faulty file
from the server side cache.

I can't come up with an easy way to sweep and fix this. Any bright
ideas? Except for adding tons of sanity checks on received data - which
on the other hand might not be that hard - recognizing our most popular
formats might be enough.

regards. Göran

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SqueakMap issues (was Re: Squeak map colours)

Lex Spoon
[hidden email] writes:
> > I also ran into this when I tried to update the URL of a released
> > SqueakMap version.  Maybe this is more in the line of what you discuss
> > with bad cached information on the server.  I ended up bumping the
> > version number even though the actual file content had not changed.


[hidden email] writes:
> IIRC the current logic is that when the URL of a release is modified -
> it will repopulate the server side cache and update the checksum,
> Was that what you tried to do? Because I thought that worked.

Before reading this thread, I did not know there was a server-side
cache at all!

Anyway, yes, I tried to update the card for Universes version 9 to
point to SqueakSource's new host name (i.e., swapping the unibe.ch
name for squeaksource.com).  For whatever reason, I could not get it
to work, so I instead posted a version 9b.

I am not sure a separate 9b card is a bad idea, anyway.  The version 9
card is already published, and, philosophically, mutating a published
card seems a little weird.


-Lex


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SqueakMap issues (was Re: Squeak map colours)

Göran Krampe
Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> wrote:

> [hidden email] writes:
> > > I also ran into this when I tried to update the URL of a released
> > > SqueakMap version.  Maybe this is more in the line of what you discuss
> > > with bad cached information on the server.  I ended up bumping the
> > > version number even though the actual file content had not changed.
>
>
> [hidden email] writes:
> > IIRC the current logic is that when the URL of a release is modified -
> > it will repopulate the server side cache and update the checksum,
> > Was that what you tried to do? Because I thought that worked.
>
> Before reading this thread, I did not know there was a server-side
> cache at all!
>
> Anyway, yes, I tried to update the card for Universes version 9 to
> point to SqueakSource's new host name (i.e., swapping the unibe.ch
> name for squeaksource.com).  For whatever reason, I could not get it
> to work, so I instead posted a version 9b.
>
> I am not sure a separate 9b card is a bad idea, anyway.  The version 9
> card is already published, and, philosophically, mutating a published
> card seems a little weird.

Exactly.

Well, I will just have to test it myself again. I can't say why it
didn't work for you.

regards, Göran

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

Bert Freudenberg
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli

Am 27.09.2006 um 07:33 schrieb Lukas Renggli:

>> There is a SystemOrganization>fileOut method that appears to work
>> (although for some reason making a file 'SystemOrganization.
>> 1.st.st' !) and maybe that was hooked up at some point.
>
> Also it is very important to properly log class renames. There is
> something broken in this area as well.

... as well as when moving a method from one category to an other -  
if this moves a method from one package to another, only one MC  
package is marked dirty. Also, IIRC, renaming a method category does  
not trigger any notification.

- Bert -


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

2GB VM Crash (was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

Bert Freudenberg
In reply to this post by timrowledge

Am 27.09.2006 um 01:01 schrieb tim Rowledge:

>
> On 26-Sep-06, at 3:11 PM, Brad Fuller wrote:
>
>>>
>>> and see if it can give us the stack in hex.
>> [bfuller@ives bld]$ ./squeak /home/bfuller/projects/squeak/images/
>> Squeak3.9g-7060.image
>>
>> sweep failed to find exact end of memory
>>
>> 813821F4 Morph>hasDropShadow
>> 81381ABC Morph>fullDrawOn:
>> 81381A60 Canvas>fullDraw:
>> 81381A04 Canvas>fullDrawMorph:
>
> Thanks Brad. That 128-and-a-bit Mb jump is definitely puzzling.  
> That's a lot of allocations between the start of doOneCycleNowFor:  
> and displayWorldSafely:

Wasn't the test case to allocate some huge FloatArrays? Might explain  
the jump. And the crash, if the arrays are allocated across the 2GB  
border.

- Bert -


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SystemOrganization changes not recorded ( was Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final)

stephane ducasse-2
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
I would be nice to have a list of the bugs that would be nice to fix.

Stef


>
> Am 27.09.2006 um 07:33 schrieb Lukas Renggli:
>
>>> There is a SystemOrganization>fileOut method that appears to work
>>> (although for some reason making a file 'SystemOrganization.
>>> 1.st.st' !) and maybe that was hooked up at some point.
>>
>> Also it is very important to properly log class renames. There is
>> something broken in this area as well.
>
> ... as well as when moving a method from one category to an other -  
> if this moves a method from one package to another, only one MC  
> package is marked dirty. Also, IIRC, renaming a method category  
> does not trigger any notification.
>
> - Bert -
>
>


1234