Squeak's presence on GitHub

> On 29 May 2013 15:12, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Frank Shearar-3 wrote
>>> One thing that I should note is that it may be the case that
>>> membership in an organisation is not public by default.
>>
>> It seems that it's up to each member. At
>> https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk?tab=members I see "11 members", but only
>> 5 other users listed. I also was presented with a "Publicize Membership"
>> button, which I immediately and vigorously pushed ;)
>
> I think the organization owner can also dictate the visibility: I see
> "Conceal membership" and "Publicize membership" buttons, as
> appropriate, for each member.
>
> frank

>
> On 2013-05-29, at 17:04, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2013 15:12, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Frank Shearar-3 wrote
>>>> One thing that I should note is that it may be the case that
>>>> membership in an organisation is not public by default.
>>>
>>> It seems that it's up to each member. At
>>> https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk?tab=members I see "11 members", but
>>> only
>>> 5 other users listed. I also was presented with a "Publicize Membership"
>>> button, which I immediately and vigorously pushed ;)
>>
>> I think the organization owner can also dictate the visibility: I see
>> "Conceal membership" and "Publicize membership" buttons, as
>> appropriate, for each member.
>>
>> frank
>
> IMHO you should publicize everyone. I see no reason to keep the membership
> secret.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>