SqueakInf11-Schlager Anmerkungen

Naja, OK, ich kann einiges auch icht immer nachvollziehen. Das stimmt schon. Man muss wohl die
Sprachen auch imemr in verlgeichbar loesbare Aufgabenstellungen separieren. Die Zahlen fuer die
SLOC/FP finden sich dafuer hingegen in vielen Tabellen wieder. Diese nehme ich nur gerne, da sie
recht vollstaendig ist. Die Werte der anderen Tabellen weichen nicht sehr stark ab.

  

Literaturanhang:

1. Bames, B.; Durek, T.; Gaffney, J.: A Framework and Economic Foundation for Software Reuse. in IEEE Tutorial Software Reuse Ed. W. Tracz, IEEE Press, L.A., 1988, p. 77

2. Brodie, M.; Stonebraker, M.: Migrating Legacy Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Pub., San Francisco, 1995

3. Chapin, N.: A Measure of Software Complexity. in Proc. of NCC, Chicago, 1977, p. 995

4. Cimitile, A.; De Lucia, A.; Minro, M.: A Specification Driven Slicing Process for identifying Reusable Functions. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 1996, p. 145

5. Dahl, O.; Dijkstra, E.; Hoare, C.: Structured Programming. Academic Press, London, 1972, p. 63

6. Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Koeppe, R.; Winkler, A.: Software Qualität durch Meßtools. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, 1996

7. Endres, A.: Software-Wiederverwendung - Ziele, Wege und Erfahrungen. in Informatik Spektrum, Nov. 1988, p. 85

8. Fenton, N.: Software Metrics - A rigorous approach. Chapman & Hall, London, 1991

9. Halstead, M.: Elements of Software Science. Elvesier Pub., New York, 1977, p. 79

10. Hehner, E.: Predicative Programming. in Comm. of ACM, Vol. 27, No. 2, Feb. 1984, p.134

11. Henry, S.; Kafura, D.: Software Structure Metrics based on Information Flow. in IEEE Trans. on S.E. , Vol 7, No. 5, Sept. 1981

12. ISO/IEC: Software Product Evaluation - Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for their use. ISO/IEC Standard ISO-9126, 1991

13. Kozacynski, W.; Niny, J.: Program Concept Recognition and Transformation in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 18, No.12, Dec. 1992, p. 1065

14. Lanubile, G.; Visaggio, G.: Extracting Reusable Functions by Flow Graph-Based Program Slicing. in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 23, No. 4, April 1997, p. 246

15. Li, W.: An Empirical Study of Software Reuse in Reconstructive Maintenance. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 9, No. 2, March 1997, p. 69

16. McCabe, T.: A Complexity Measure. in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 7, No. 5, Sept.1981

17. Schach, S.: Economic Impact of Software Reuse on Maintenance. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 6, No. 4, July 1994, p. 185

18. Sneed, H.: Economics of Software Reengineering. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 3, No. 3, Sept. 1991, p. 163

19. Sneed, H.: Software muß messbar werden. in Information Management 4/91, Nov. 1991, p.56

20. Sneed, H.: Understanding Software through Numbers - A metric based Approach to Program Comprehension. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 7, No. 6, Nov. 1995, p. 405

21. Sneed, H.: Encapsulating Legacy Software for Use in Client/Server Systems. in Proc. of 3rd Conf. in Reverse Eng., IEEE Press, Monterey, Nov. 1996, p. 104

22. Welker, K.; Oman, P.; Atkinson, G.: Development and Applikation of an automated Source Code Maintainability Index. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 9, No. 3, May 1997, p. 127

23. Zuse, H.: Software Complexity - Measures and Methods. de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin, 1991

24. Mary B. Chrissis, Mike Konrad, Sandy Shrum: CMMI. Guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Addison-Wesley, Boston 2003

25. Ralf Kneuper: CMMI. Verbesserung von Softwareprozessen mit Capability Maturity Model Integration. 2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg 2006

26. Ernest Wallmüller: SPI - Software Process Improvement mit CMMI und ISO 15504. Hanser, München 2006

Guido Stepken