Hi Hernan Why are you always so negative? Do you think that this is easy? Inria paid Denis to build a remote tool suite for ***research purpose*** and we discovered that a new remote invocation framework was needed and that they were far too many discussions between the model and the view. Denis proposed to build a new browser (and it was not in our plans) and we decided that we cannot do it otherwise. We could keep this tool for us but we share it with the community. Do you want another example? I asked christopher to build versionner and he discovered that he cannot script well enough the model. And versionner was made for everybody. Now with git we will have to revise it. Do you want another example? Iceberg we payed nicolas passerini to analyse the situation and to build a system that other people can use it. Do you want another example? Esteban got in his face the FFI problem: you see Spur arrives and FFI nabive boost does not so what do we do? He worked like a mad (and it was not planned because we thought that igor would adpta NB to spur then to 64 bits). And the FFI is for everbody. Do you want another example? We spent one year with pavel, guillermo and christophe to make sure that we can make sure that the three yars effort of the phd of guillermo on bootstrap are not lost. Do you want more? All my books are open-source? Do you know how much time I take to write a book? I spent 8 months designing a mooc and do you know how much I earned doing it: 3000 Euros ( so I will make the computation to know how much per hour I lost) and the mooc is free. May be all these examples have no value for you. But for me they have. So you see you can piss on us if it makes you feeling better, and you can rant in your corner. But this is not the vision I have about a community because we are sharing all the things that we are doing. Stef On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by hernanmd
A final point I cannot work with the dark theme. But the interest of Pharo is more important that own little ego. I will try and put a preference if I fail. Why because we need to have a different look for the version and I proposed this change!!!!!! Stef On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
Make it default so that it will bother people enough to fix the glitches. Phil On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
On 15/04/17 14:43, [hidden email] wrote:
> Make it default so that it will bother people enough to fix the glitches. That is fine to do for half a year starting with Pharo 7. I'm all in favor of making changes in development that help us improve. It is definitely not a good idea to make sure that no external project looks good at the release of Pharo 6, and make life worse for 80% of developers. Released version needs to be a light theme. In development we can switch for a while Stephan |
In reply to this post by philippeback
Wow guys seriously it's a setting , not the end of the world . Completely agree with Cyril , I find white theme terrible and I never imagined making such a big fuss for a setting.
You guys need to chill out. Lol at Phil , funny and true.
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
All major desktop OSes have light theme by default. Most web sites have white or light background and dark text. Almost all PDF documents have white background.
Switching between dark and light themed applications puts strain on the eyes. So it's not just aesthetic preference. Dark theme will be uncomfortable to use for most users. "Looking cool" or "being different" is not an excuse. Image and video editing programs are a different story, because edited content usually takes most of the screen space. |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Ah, the tips are readable at least. Just kidding ;)
Good job. Hilaire Le 14/04/2017 à 09:09, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > I wanted to let you know that we talked at the board and we want to make the DarkTheme a default for Pharo 6.0. > This is just because we want to have a visual immediate reference of changing things (yeah, marketing ;) ) -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu |
In reply to this post by webwarrior
> Am 15.04.2017 um 15:35 schrieb webwarrior <[hidden email]>: > > All major desktop OSes have light theme by default. Most web sites have white > or light background and dark text. Almost all PDF documents have white > background. > > Switching between dark and light themed applications puts strain on the > eyes. So it's not just aesthetic preference. Dark theme will be > uncomfortable to use for most users. "Looking cool" or "being different" is > not an excuse. > My problem is more the pharo dark theme. I tried to use it the last days. But the colors chosen do not work for me. Somehow they are misaligned but as I'm not an expert on that topic, I cannot give any valuable input. Norbert > Image and video editing programs are a different story, because edited > content usually takes most of the screen space. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/changing-default-theme-to-DarkTheme-tp4942038p4942224.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > |
In reply to this post by Stephane Ducasse-3
May be Herman is expressing some level of frustrations resulting from
important changes occurring in the system release after release. Your listing of changes may afraid him even more ;-) From my point of view, Pharo is changing too fast to follow what's up and to adapt code. I am still lagging with Pharo3 on Dr.Geo :) But I am only an amateur programmer, professional programmer may fell just fine with this pace of change. But anyway, because of its energy and community, Pharo is definitely the best free Smalltalk horse around. Hilaire Le 15/04/2017 à 14:30, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : > Why are you always so negative? Do you think that this is easy? > -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu |
In reply to this post by NorbertHartl
On 15/04/17 16:02, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> And comparing the capability of building > contrasts with colors, dark colors win, sorry. At least that were the > last researches I've read. Which ones? https://webstandards.hhs.gov/guidelines/106 seems pretty clear. Stephan |
Yes, it is clear that "When users are expected to rapidly read and understand prose text, use black text on a plain, high-contrast, non-patterned background." That is what I said. If you read a lot of text then dark on light works better. This is not the case if the text is colored which it is when syntax highlighting is used. A lot of colors typically used within highlighting build a weaker contrast with white then they do with dark background. I don't have the papers at hand. I try to find those references again. Norbert |
In reply to this post by Stephane Ducasse-3
I vote for a voting system for these kind of changes. I cannot say it more clearly, and I don't know why is asking for a voting system negative? We all have problems. In the meantime you will make all the changes you like to do, and I will continue working on my own way, until I find there is more voice for the "small minority".2017-04-15 9:30 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
|
In reply to this post by NorbertHartl
I'm not saying that light on dark is bad. I'm saying that switching between light on dark and dark on light is uncomfortable. Like when you have to look something up on the web, or read docs/notes, or move files in file manager, etc. You're not working in Pharo all the time, right? |
In reply to this post by HilaireFernandes
Hilaire We are porting Moose in max two days for each version and it is around 150 packages. Now if you want to be able to use Athens then one guy as to fix FFI if you want to use Spur, 64bits..... So such kind of rants are totally useless, counterproductive and our community deserves more. I worked 4 months to write a project proposal to bring money in the community and new people and I may lose all my efforts if the project is not accepted and when I see such kind of behavior. I'm just thinking that it is UNFAIR!!!! Stef On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Hilaire <[hidden email]> wrote: May be Herman is expressing some level of frustrations resulting from |
In reply to this post by hernanmd
There is no voting for such default. Why because this is marketing! I do not like the black theme but I find the white one not good either. And we need to have a different look. So you will add a preference script to set it back to white and perfect. I fully agree with Cyril. If one day we set a model it will be the one of avogado and with weight based on contribution. Stef On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by HilaireFernandes
Hey Hilaire, Not afraid at all, because I know where the changes come from.Hernán 2017-04-15 11:04 GMT-03:00 Hilaire <[hidden email]>: May be Herman is expressing some level of frustrations resulting from |
BTW, if you open the welcome help that users will see after opening of Pharo 6, you will realize, that switching of the theme to white one is matter of one click: WelcomeHelp openForRelease Cheers, -- Pavel 2017-04-15 18:18 GMT+02:00 Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]>:
|
In reply to this post by hernanmd
Bah, I made GTSpotter dark theme work with SublimishTheme and got the "yeah, for Pharo7". It is pissing me off but what can I say, just follow what is released. Compare Pharo 1 and Pharo 6. Worlds apart. I hope this continues. Phil On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Hernán Morales Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Isn't a couple days before release a bit late to change the default theme ? Aren't we in feature freeze mode ? If for marketing it makes sense to switch to the dark theme, then let's switch to dark theme. But why not switching for Pharo 7 instead ? Instability is bad for marketing anyway, isn't it ? I don't mind for myself, I will always switch back with user settings to the light theme it's more about the general perception of Pharo stability. On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:31 AM, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Totally agree Phil even on the documentation front we are light years ahead of version 2. I think it will become a problem that Pharo improves to fast, but that's a blessing problem.kudos to the amazing work of Pharo devs .
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |