Could we fix the web site

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
100 messages Options
12345
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Could we fix the web site

Stéphane Ducasse-3
Hi all

Happy new years. I wish you a lot of fun and success for your  
squeaking projects.


Now I would like to know if this is possible to fix the squeak web site.
I was a nice idea to put the news seeds in the web site but but but.
        - we do not control the contents
        - some of them are not really squeaking
        - some of them contain a lot of typos.

        "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  
thought I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very  
good information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
        Sorry but I do not know who is mathieu :) and this give me the  
impression to get in a private discussion.


I want to be **proud** to put a link on http:/www.squeak.org/ on  
important documents.
So could we ut the welcome section right on the top. and the news  
after the portal.

Stef



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

karl-8
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Happy new years. I wish you a lot of fun and success for your
> squeaking projects.
>
>
> Now I would like to know if this is possible to fix the squeak web site.
> I was a nice idea to put the news seeds in the web site but but but.
>     - we do not control the contents
>     - some of them are not really squeaking
>     - some of them contain a lot of typos.
>
>     "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
> Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I thought
> I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very good
> information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
>     Sorry but I do not know who is mathieu :) and this give me the
> impression to get in a private discussion.
>
>
> I want to be **proud** to put a link on http:/www.squeak.org/ on
> important documents.
> So could we ut the welcome section right on the top. and the news
> after the portal.
>
> Stef
>
>
>
>
The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news team you
will be able to post directly.
Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should probably be
addressed to the news team.
Karl


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

stephane ducasse
Hi karl

my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think that  
we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  
squeak web site, it should be great.
And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove all  
the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  
squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.

>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>>
> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news team  
> you will be able to post directly.

I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.

> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  
> probably be addressed to the news team.
> Karl
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

karl-8
stephane ducasse wrote:

> Hi karl
>
> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think that
> we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the
> squeak web site, it should be great.
> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove all
> the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about
> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of it's
software. I would consider that a very big news item.
The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody wants to
lead the web team so this was a good solution for us, since a webpage
that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in my book.

>
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news team
>> you will be able to post directly.
>
> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.
I find that hard to believe ;-)
Karl

>
>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should probably
>> be addressed to the news team.
>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

stephane ducasse
This is a question of style.
The news can be something else than the first item that we read. But  
ok I will remove all my links to squeak.org. I do not want to get burnt
by that.

Stef


> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> Hi karl
>>
>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think  
>> that we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  
>> squeak web site, it should be great.
>> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove  
>> all the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
>> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  
>> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
> The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of  
> it's software. I would consider that a very big news item.
> The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  
> wants to lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  
> since a webpage that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in  
> my book.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  
>>> team you will be able to post directly.
>>
>> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.
> I find that hard to believe ;-)
> Karl
>>
>>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  
>>> probably be addressed to the news team.
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Giovanni Corriga
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Il giorno sab, 06/01/2007 alle 18.07 +0100, stephane ducasse ha scritto:

> Hi karl
>
> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think that  
> we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  
> squeak web site, it should be great.
> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove all  
> the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  
> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.

News _should_ be in the top part of the home page, maybe after the "What
is Squeak" blurb.
That said, I don't think that the Weekly Squeak news feed should be
integrated in the main page of squeak.org: many of the news items are
interesting for those who already know and use Squeak, and not for those
that go to squeak.org to learn what Squeak is.
A better solution would be to cherrypick TWS' most interesting news
items only.

> > The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news team  
> > you will be able to post directly.
>
> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.

We are always looking for feedback anyway, so if anywants want to ask
something or give us some feedback, may send a message to
[hidden email] .

        Giovanni


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

stephane ducasse
In reply to this post by karl-8
Karl

really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my  
mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
Don't you understand that we are in a world where people communicate  
and judge on form?

News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes  
squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting  
involved but just want to give a glance.

Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we do  
not control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by hand)
  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put it  
up front.

        "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  
thought I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very  
good information about Croquet support for third party tools...."

So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I think  
that this is important.

Stef

On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:

> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> Hi karl
>>
>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think  
>> that we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  
>> squeak web site, it should be great.
>> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove  
>> all the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
>> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  
>> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
> The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of  
> it's software. I would consider that a very big news item.
> The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  
> wants to lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  
> since a webpage that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in  
> my book.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  
>>> team you will be able to post directly.
>>
>> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.
> I find that hard to believe ;-)
> Karl
>>
>>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  
>>> probably be addressed to the news team.
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Brad Fuller-3
stephane ducasse wrote:

> Karl
>
> really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my
> mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
> Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
> Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
> Don't you understand that we are in a world where people communicate
> and judge on form?
>
> News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes
> squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
> what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting
> involved but just want to give a glance.
First let me say that I'm delighted that others care about what the
website looks like!

I assume that visitors with varying degrees of expertise visit the
squeak.org top page. I think the question we should ask is what
information should we deliver, and how should we deliver that
information, to be the best service for the visitors. There are a few
issue here that make this a challenge for us. I'm sure there are more.

- First, I don't think we know who those visitors are. For instance,
what is their expertise level and why they are at squeak.org? What are
they searching for?

- Another issue is should the site be a dynamic site, or a site where
the information doesn't necessarily change much.

- Yet another issue is that we are but a few volunteers, and the list is
getting smaller to help with the site.

I take away from these recent posts that you believe the visitors are
are new to squeak and are searching to find out more. Is that right? My
answer is I just don't know who they are.

To me, static web sites show a stale and static life of the
organization. That might not be what is really going on underneath the
hood, but it looks like that to the visitors. If there is no life,
people tend to believe it's either an old site with old content, or the
site authors don't care or have the time to update the site. If visitors
find this, they turn away and look elsewhere. I could be wrong, but If
I'm not, this is something we don't want to occur.

I'd like to make squeak.org a place where all levels of expertise visit
regularly. For old timers, they get the news they want. For those
seeking to find out what squeak is about, they see a vibrant community
and an aggressive and interesting development of squeak. One way to do
that is to build a dynamic presence.  Dynamic news feeds provides a
small portion of this. If the site was integrated with an up-to-date,
ever changing wiki, that would certainly help people who are looking for
technical answers keep coming back. And, it would assist beginners too.

My belief is that we need a proper mix of 1) news, 2) well trimmed,
up-to-date technical information (wiki) and 3) a comprehensive
introduction to squeak (which is what the site is right now, but it too
needs to be trimmed better.)

Since this is a volunteer organization, and most of us don't have time
to build a site that is dynamic as I'm recommending, I suggested feeding
the front site with something that was of interest to others and was
dynamic. That's all.

Can you or any others help us out?


>
> Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we do
> not control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by hand)
>  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put it
> up front.
>
>     "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
> Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I thought
> I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very good
> information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
We do control it. It's the news guys. They can just fix their typos and
it'll be fine.
>
> So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I think
> that this is important.

Anyone else agree?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Joshua Gargus-2
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Stephane makes a good point.  If we want http://squeak.org to be the  
public face of Squeak to the outside world, then the news feeds  
should absolutely not appear at the very top.  Instead, the Welcome!  
section should come first to give a basic understanding of the entire  
site. That much is clear (right?  if not, why?)

We could then go on to debate some more ambiguous decisions.  For  
example, within the news section, I would put the squeak.org-specific  
"Posted News" above the external "News Feeds".  However, I have other  
things to do this fine Saturday than to push hard on that point, or  
similar ones.

Happy weekend Squeaking,
Josh


On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:28 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:

> Karl
>
> really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my  
> mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
> Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
> Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
> Don't you understand that we are in a world where people  
> communicate and judge on form?
>
> News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes  
> squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
> what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting  
> involved but just want to give a glance.
>
> Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we  
> do not control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by  
> hand)
>  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put  
> it up front.
>
> "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
> Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  
> thought I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very  
> good information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
>
> So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I  
> think that this is important.
>
> Stef
>
> On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:
>
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>> Hi karl
>>>
>>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think  
>>> that we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>>> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  
>>> squeak web site, it should be great.
>>> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove  
>>> all the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
>>> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  
>>> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
>> The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of  
>> it's software. I would consider that a very big news item.
>> The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  
>> wants to lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  
>> since a webpage that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in  
>> my book.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  
>>>> team you will be able to post directly.
>>>
>>> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to  
>>> say.
>> I find that hard to believe ;-)
>> Karl
>>>
>>>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  
>>>> probably be addressed to the news team.
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

timrowledge
In reply to this post by Brad Fuller-3
If it is plausible technically, I'd like to suggest that a small  
number of news items by put in a scrolling line like we see on the  
apple.com page ('Hot News Headlines'). Just the headline, so no  
"Howard Stearns etc etc" just 'Croquet editing and creation of 3D  
Objects' and 'Exupery Talk; Brussels 2006 Smalltalk Party' etc.

This would take very little room and yet provide links to a good  
number of news items. I'd hazard a guess that it would allow editors  
to leave the main page alone and simply change the content of some  
other file.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Strange OpCodes: IKI: Ignore Keyboard Input



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

timrowledge
If possible, could we edit the license page to include the news about  
the license being changed? I know the process is not complete yet but  
it is an important point, at least to all those perpetual complainers  
about such matters. I dare say there'll be people complaining that  
the Apache license isn't good enough even after all the work...

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- Ready to check in at the HaHa Hilton.



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

J J-6
In reply to this post by Joshua Gargus-2

Well what do other people do?  Haskell is pretty popular these days.  Here
is their site:
http://haskell.org



>From: Joshua Gargus <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<[hidden email]>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<[hidden email]>
>Subject: Re: Could we fix the web site
>Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:00:05 -0800
>
>Stephane makes a good point.  If we want http://squeak.org to be the  
>public face of Squeak to the outside world, then the news feeds  should
>absolutely not appear at the very top.  Instead, the Welcome!  section
>should come first to give a basic understanding of the entire  site. That
>much is clear (right?  if not, why?)
>
>We could then go on to debate some more ambiguous decisions.  For  example,
>within the news section, I would put the squeak.org-specific  "Posted News"
>above the external "News Feeds".  However, I have other  things to do this
>fine Saturday than to push hard on that point, or  similar ones.
>
>Happy weekend Squeaking,
>Josh
>
>
>On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:28 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>
>>Karl
>>
>>really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my  mail
>>but this is not a simple idiot remark.
>>Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
>>Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
>>Don't you understand that we are in a world where people  communicate and
>>judge on form?
>>
>>News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes  squeak
>>is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
>>what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting  involved
>>but just want to give a glance.
>>
>>Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we  do not
>>control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by  hand)
>>  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put  it up
>>front.
>>
>> "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
>>Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  thought
>>I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very  good
>>information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
>>
>>So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I  think that
>>this is important.
>>
>>Stef
>>
>>On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:
>>
>>>stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>>Hi karl
>>>>
>>>>my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think  that
>>>>we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>>>>evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  squeak
>>>>web site, it should be great.
>>>>And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove  all
>>>>the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
>>>>would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  squeak
>>>>going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
>>>The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of  it's
>>>software. I would consider that a very big news item.
>>>The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  wants to
>>>lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  since a webpage
>>>that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in  my book.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Stef
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  team you
>>>>>will be able to post directly.
>>>>
>>>>I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to  say.
>>>I find that hard to believe ;-)
>>>Karl
>>>>
>>>>>Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  probably
>>>>>be addressed to the news team.
>>>>>Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page
www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

tblanchard
Actually - these are the guys to catch:
http://www.rubyonrails.org/
On Jan 6, 2007, at 12:21 PM, J J wrote:

>
> Well what do other people do?  Haskell is pretty popular these  
> days.  Here is their site:
> http://haskell.org
>
>
>
>> From: Joshua Gargus <[hidden email]>
>> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list<squeak-
>> [hidden email]>
>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list<squeak-
>> [hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: Could we fix the web site
>> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:00:05 -0800
>>
>> Stephane makes a good point.  If we want http://squeak.org to be  
>> the  public face of Squeak to the outside world, then the news  
>> feeds  should absolutely not appear at the very top.  Instead, the  
>> Welcome!  section should come first to give a basic understanding  
>> of the entire  site. That much is clear (right?  if not, why?)
>>
>> We could then go on to debate some more ambiguous decisions.  For  
>> example, within the news section, I would put the squeak.org-
>> specific  "Posted News" above the external "News Feeds".  However,  
>> I have other  things to do this fine Saturday than to push hard on  
>> that point, or  similar ones.
>>
>> Happy weekend Squeaking,
>> Josh
>>
>>
>> On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:28 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind  
>>> my  mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
>>> Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
>>> Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
>>> Don't you understand that we are in a world where people  
>>> communicate and judge on form?
>>>
>>> News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that  
>>> describes  squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing  
>>> at all
>>> what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting  
>>> involved but just want to give a glance.
>>>
>>> Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that  
>>> we  do not control (or may be somebody edited the text and the  
>>> list by  hand)
>>>  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not  
>>> put  it up front.
>>>
>>> "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
>>> Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  
>>> thought I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of  
>>> very  good information about Croquet support for third party  
>>> tools...."
>>>
>>> So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I  
>>> think that this is important.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:
>>>
>>>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>>> Hi karl
>>>>>
>>>>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I  
>>>>> think  that we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>>>>> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on  
>>>>> the  squeak web site, it should be great.
>>>>> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can  
>>>>> remove  all the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org  
>>>>> but this
>>>>> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything  
>>>>> about  squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph  
>>>>> right now.
>>>> The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part  
>>>> of  it's software. I would consider that a very big news item.
>>>> The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  
>>>> wants to lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  
>>>> since a webpage that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least  
>>>> in  my book.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  
>>>>>> team you will be able to post directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing  
>>>>> to  say.
>>>> I find that hard to believe ;-)
>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  
>>>>>> probably be addressed to the news team.
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football  
> Page www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

karl-8
In reply to this post by J J-6
J J wrote:
>
> Well what do other people do? Haskell is pretty popular these days.
> Here is their site:
> http://haskell.org
>
http://www.python.org/ has 'about python' first.
http://www.java.com is just ads and presentations
http://www.erlang.org is just news
http://www.perl.org is a table/menu of links and then news
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vbasic/default.aspx is news/tutorials
and ads
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vcsharp/default.aspx is news/tutorials

There seems there is no general consensus about what should be first.
But if the majority of Squeakers think the 'about' should be fist it's
easy to change.
I'm not sure about getting just headlines though... Brad?
Karl

>
>
>> From: Joshua Gargus <[hidden email]>
>> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>> list<[hidden email]>
>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>> list<[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: Could we fix the web site
>> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:00:05 -0800
>>
>> Stephane makes a good point. If we want http://squeak.org to be the
>> public face of Squeak to the outside world, then the news feeds
>> should absolutely not appear at the very top. Instead, the Welcome!
>> section should come first to give a basic understanding of the entire
>> site. That much is clear (right? if not, why?)
>>
>> We could then go on to debate some more ambiguous decisions. For
>> example, within the news section, I would put the squeak.org-specific
>> "Posted News" above the external "News Feeds". However, I have other
>> things to do this fine Saturday than to push hard on that point, or
>> similar ones.
>>
>> Happy weekend Squeaking,
>> Josh
>>
>>
>> On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:28 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my
>>> mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
>>> Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
>>> Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
>>> Don't you understand that we are in a world where people communicate
>>> and judge on form?
>>>
>>> News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes
>>> squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
>>> what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting
>>> involved but just want to give a glance.
>>>
>>> Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we do
>>> not control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by hand)
>>> what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put it
>>> up front.
>>>
>>> "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
>>> Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I
>>> thought I’d reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very
>>> good information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
>>>
>>> So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I think
>>> that this is important.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:
>>>
>>>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>>> Hi karl
>>>>>
>>>>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think
>>>>> that we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
>>>>> evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the
>>>>> squeak web site, it should be great.
>>>>> And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove
>>>>> all the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
>>>>> would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about
>>>>> squeak going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
>>>> The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of
>>>> it's software. I would consider that a very big news item.
>>>> The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody
>>>> wants to lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,
>>>> since a webpage that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in
>>>> my book.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news
>>>>>> team you will be able to post directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to say.
>>>> I find that hard to believe ;-)
>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>> Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should
>>>>>> probably be addressed to the news team.
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football
> Page www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Tapple Gao
In reply to this post by Brad Fuller-3
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:50:29AM -0800, Brad Fuller wrote:

> stephane ducasse wrote:
> >Karl
> >
> >really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my
> >mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
> >Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
> >Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
> >Don't you understand that we are in a world where people communicate
> >and judge on form?
> >
> >News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes
> >squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
> >what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting
> >involved but just want to give a glance.
> First let me say that I'm delighted that others care about what the
> website looks like!
>
> I assume that visitors with varying degrees of expertise visit the
> squeak.org top page. I think the question we should ask is what
> information should we deliver, and how should we deliver that
> information, to be the best service for the visitors. There are a few
> issue here that make this a challenge for us. I'm sure there are more.
>
> - First, I don't think we know who those visitors are. For instance,
> what is their expertise level and why they are at squeak.org? What are
> they searching for?
>
> - Another issue is should the site be a dynamic site, or a site where
> the information doesn't necessarily change much.

I think that the website and Wiki should be combined into one
Pier website/wiki. My experience is that the homepage for a free
software project is mostly for beginners, and the mailing list,
wiki, and code repository is where all the action, and hence
developers, are. Thus, a combined wiki/website would attract the
range of expertise you are seeking, IMHO. I sent an email about
a Pier wiki several months ago:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-October/110510.html

Examining Pier as an alternative to Swiki is still on my to-do
list, but is currently the third item, after I finish my
tutorial index and a better Swiki index page. I could bump that
up if the community wants a better, dynamic website+wiki. If so,
I could start working on a proposal for the new website, along
with a migration strategy, by the end of January.

I am trying hard to make the Swiki pages useful
and of high enough quality that they can be a recommended
reference, rather than a hodge-podge of information. I would
like the same for the website.

> - Yet another issue is that we are but a few volunteers, and the list is
> getting smaller to help with the site.

I am quite willing to cooperate and help both the web team and
the News team, since the goals of the doc team overlap the goals
of the other two teams. However, a wiki migration would probably
be better handled by the web team.  There is no well-defined
difference between the web and doc teams, as I see it.

Technically, I don't know how well a Pier website+wiki would
scale, since Seaside is much more demanding than Apache or
Swiki.

> I take away from these recent posts that you believe the visitors are
> are new to squeak and are searching to find out more. Is that right? My
> answer is I just don't know who they are.

Well, I am still a noob, and when I first stumbled upon Squeak
(Through Croquet), I was looking for two things primarily:

- What is Squeak, and why does it exist when great things like
  Python are around?
- How do I use it?

The first question was well answered by the current website, but
I found nothing to really answer the second question. Honestly,
until I started my tutorial index this past month, I thought
there were *no* squeak beginners tutorials other than those on
dmu.com. Luckily, I was wrong, and I am trying to fill that need
with my tutorial index.

> To me, static web sites show a stale and static life of the
> organization. That might not be what is really going on underneath the
> hood, but it looks like that to the visitors. If there is no life,
> people tend to believe it's either an old site with old content, or the
> site authors don't care or have the time to update the site. If visitors
> find this, they turn away and look elsewhere. I could be wrong, but If
> I'm not, this is something we don't want to occur.

I agree. At first glance, Squeak looks like either a dead
project (since the website, and references to it contain dead
links and old documents) or a dead-end project (since nobody has
ever heard of it). The Weekly squeak has helped a lot to fix the
public image that Squeak is not dead, but is alive and growing
in my mind. Thanks News team!

> I'd like to make squeak.org a place where all levels of
> expertise visit regularly. For old timers, they get the news
> they want. For those seeking to find out what squeak is about,
> they see a vibrant community and an aggressive and interesting
> development of squeak. One way to do that is to build a
> dynamic presence.  Dynamic news feeds provides a small portion
> of this. If the site was integrated with an up-to-date, ever
> changing wiki, that would certainly help people who are
> looking for technical answers keep coming back. And, it would
> assist beginners too.

I agree ;-)

> My belief is that we need a proper mix of 1) news, 2) well
> trimmed, up-to-date technical information (wiki) and 3) a
> comprehensive introduction to squeak (which is what the site
> is right now, but it too needs to be trimmed better.)

I am working on the trimming. I can help with the mixing.

> Since this is a volunteer organization, and most of us don't
> have time to build a site that is dynamic as I'm recommending,
> I suggested feeding the front site with something that was of
> interest to others and was dynamic. That's all.

hmm. I just noticed that squeak.org already is a SmallWiki site,
which is the predecessor to Pier. Would it be possible to just
upgrade it or flip some bits to turn it into a wiki? I could
definitely bring some more life into the features and
Documentation pages, at least.

Also, is there a way I could download the squeak.org SmallWiki
image? That would help a lot when I get around to examining a
Swiki emigration.

> Can you or any others help us out?

Definitely :-)

--
Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

License Re: Could we fix the web site

karl-8
In reply to this post by timrowledge
tim Rowledge wrote:

> If possible, could we edit the license page to include the news about
> the license being changed? I know the process is not complete yet but
> it is an important point, at least to all those perpetual complainers
> about such matters. I dare say there'll be people complaining that the
> Apache license isn't good enough even after all the work...
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Useful random insult:- Ready to check in at the HaHa Hilton.
>
>
>
>
I have been waiting for some official announcement.
Do you have any links and/or info that I can put up ?
Karl

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Philippe Marschall
In reply to this post by J J-6
2007/1/6, J J <[hidden email]>:
>
> Well what do other people do?  Haskell is pretty popular these days.  Here
> is their site:
> http://haskell.org

http://python.org/

> >From: Joshua Gargus <[hidden email]>
> >Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
> >list<[hidden email]>
> >To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
> >list<[hidden email]>
> >Subject: Re: Could we fix the web site
> >Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:00:05 -0800
> >
> >Stephane makes a good point.  If we want http://squeak.org to be the
> >public face of Squeak to the outside world, then the news feeds  should
> >absolutely not appear at the very top.  Instead, the Welcome!  section
> >should come first to give a basic understanding of the entire  site. That
> >much is clear (right?  if not, why?)
> >
> >We could then go on to debate some more ambiguous decisions.  For  example,
> >within the news section, I would put the squeak.org-specific  "Posted News"
> >above the external "News Feeds".  However, I have other  things to do this
> >fine Saturday than to push hard on that point, or  similar ones.
> >
> >Happy weekend Squeaking,
> >Josh
> >
> >
> >On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:28 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
> >
> >>Karl
> >>
> >>really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my  mail
> >>but this is not a simple idiot remark.
> >>Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
> >>Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
> >>Don't you understand that we are in a world where people  communicate and
> >>judge on form?
> >>
> >>News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes  squeak
> >>is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
> >>what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting  involved
> >>but just want to give a glance.
> >>
> >>Then there are 5 typos in the following text. So the fact that we  do not
> >>control (or may be somebody edited the text and the list by  hand)
> >>  what is published there would push us to be cautious and not put  it up
> >>front.
> >>
> >>      "Croquet Edit and Create 3d Objects
> >>Howard Stearns reciently replyed to a question from Mathieu. I  thought
> >>I'd reporduce his response here. Howard give a lot of very  good
> >>information about Croquet support for third party tools...."
> >>
> >>So what I suggest is to swap the welcome and the news feeds. I  think that
> >>this is important.
> >>
> >>Stef
> >>
> >>On 6 janv. 07, at 18:53, Karl wrote:
> >>
> >>>stephane ducasse wrote:
> >>>>Hi karl
> >>>>
> >>>>my point is about the place of the news on the web site. I think  that
> >>>>we need something that anybody (and certainly someone
> >>>>evaluating me can understand). When people click on my cv on the  squeak
> >>>>web site, it should be great.
> >>>>And the news section should not be the top items. Or I can remove  all
> >>>>the links I have on my sites and cv to squeak.org but this
> >>>>would be sad because imagine a person not knowing anything about  squeak
> >>>>going to the site and reading the first paragraph right now.
> >>>The first paragraph is about the OLPC which has Squeak as part of  it's
> >>>software. I would consider that a very big news item.
> >>>The frontpage got very static and nobody updated it and nobody  wants to
> >>>lead the web team so this was a good solution for us,  since a webpage
> >>>that newer changes is a dead webpage, at least in  my book.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Stef
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>The news feed is from news.squeak.org so if you join the news  team you
> >>>>>will be able to post directly.
> >>>>
> >>>>I do not want. I have nothing against news and I have nothing to  say.
> >>>I find that hard to believe ;-)
> >>>Karl
> >>>>
> >>>>>Typos and other standards of posting to the news feed should  probably
> >>>>>be addressed to the news team.
> >>>>>Karl
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page
> www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Alexandre Jasmin
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
I think this is annoying. The websties of most companies and software
projects put too much emphasis on news and press releases.

http://mesa3d.org/ for instance has nothing but news on the front page.
You have to click a link in the left pane to learn what the project is
about.

I think http://www.kde.org/ is somewhat better because there's a small
description of the project before the news feed and you can click the
"more" link if that's not instructive enough.

News are still important thought. Since most user won't bother to
subscribe to malling list and rss feeds, the website is their sole
indication that the project is alive.


> Hi karl
>
> my point is about the place of the news on the web site.
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

Yann Monclair-2

On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Alexandre Jasmin wrote:

> I think this is annoying. The websties of most companies and software
> projects put too much emphasis on news and press releases.
>
> http://mesa3d.org/ for instance has nothing but news on the front  
> page.
> You have to click a link in the left pane to learn what the project is
> about.
>
> I think http://www.kde.org/ is somewhat better because there's a small
> description of the project before the news feed and you can click the
> "more" link if that's not instructive enough.

this is not a KDE vs. Gnome troll, but I do prefer the gnome website :p
I think a big picture that sends you to the download/get started page  
is a great idea. When you get on the site, you just *have to click*!

Also have the news and other info reachable, but not taking all the  
space. We want people to use squeak, not just to read about it ;)

>
> News are still important thought. Since most user won't bother to
> subscribe to malling list and rss feeds, the website is their sole
> indication that the project is alive.
>
>
>> Hi karl
>>
>> my point is about the place of the news on the web site.
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Could we fix the web site

karl-8
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Matthew Fulmer wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:50:29AM -0800, Brad Fuller wrote:
>  
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>    
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> really I'm quite annoyed. I cannot tell you all the story behind my
>>> mail but this is not a simple idiot remark.
>>> Can't we get the welcome paragraph in the first place?
>>> Should I really totally boycott Squeak?
>>> Don't you understand that we are in a world where people communicate
>>> and judge on form?
>>>
>>> News Feed as a title of the first item of the page that describes
>>> squeak is not a smart choice. For somehow not knowing at all
>>> what squeak is about and that does not really care about getting
>>> involved but just want to give a glance.
>>>      
>> First let me say that I'm delighted that others care about what the
>> website looks like!
>>
>> I assume that visitors with varying degrees of expertise visit the
>> squeak.org top page. I think the question we should ask is what
>> information should we deliver, and how should we deliver that
>> information, to be the best service for the visitors. There are a few
>> issue here that make this a challenge for us. I'm sure there are more.
>>
>> - First, I don't think we know who those visitors are. For instance,
>> what is their expertise level and why they are at squeak.org? What are
>> they searching for?
>>
>> - Another issue is should the site be a dynamic site, or a site where
>> the information doesn't necessarily change much.
>>    
>
> I think that the website and Wiki should be combined into one
> Pier website/wiki. My experience is that the homepage for a free
> software project is mostly for beginners, and the mailing list,
> wiki, and code repository is where all the action, and hence
> developers, are. Thus, a combined wiki/website would attract the
> range of expertise you are seeking, IMHO. I sent an email about
> a Pier wiki several months ago:
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-October/110510.html
>
> Examining Pier as an alternative to Swiki is still on my to-do
> list, but is currently the third item, after I finish my
> tutorial index and a better Swiki index page. I could bump that
> up if the community wants a better, dynamic website+wiki. If so,
> I could start working on a proposal for the new website, along
> with a migration strategy, by the end of January.
>
> I am trying hard to make the Swiki pages useful
> and of high enough quality that they can be a recommended
> reference, rather than a hodge-podge of information. I would
> like the same for the website.
>
>  
>> - Yet another issue is that we are but a few volunteers, and the list is
>> getting smaller to help with the site.
>>    
>
> I am quite willing to cooperate and help both the web team and
> the News team, since the goals of the doc team overlap the goals
> of the other two teams. However, a wiki migration would probably
> be better handled by the web team.  There is no well-defined
> difference between the web and doc teams, as I see it.
>
> Technically, I don't know how well a Pier website+wiki would
> scale, since Seaside is much more demanding than Apache or
> Swiki.
>
>  
>> I take away from these recent posts that you believe the visitors are
>> are new to squeak and are searching to find out more. Is that right? My
>> answer is I just don't know who they are.
>>    
>
> Well, I am still a noob, and when I first stumbled upon Squeak
> (Through Croquet), I was looking for two things primarily:
>
> - What is Squeak, and why does it exist when great things like
>   Python are around?
> - How do I use it?
>
> The first question was well answered by the current website, but
> I found nothing to really answer the second question. Honestly,
> until I started my tutorial index this past month, I thought
> there were *no* squeak beginners tutorials other than those on
> dmu.com. Luckily, I was wrong, and I am trying to fill that need
> with my tutorial index.
>
>  
>> To me, static web sites show a stale and static life of the
>> organization. That might not be what is really going on underneath the
>> hood, but it looks like that to the visitors. If there is no life,
>> people tend to believe it's either an old site with old content, or the
>> site authors don't care or have the time to update the site. If visitors
>> find this, they turn away and look elsewhere. I could be wrong, but If
>> I'm not, this is something we don't want to occur.
>>    
>
> I agree. At first glance, Squeak looks like either a dead
> project (since the website, and references to it contain dead
> links and old documents) or a dead-end project (since nobody has
> ever heard of it). The Weekly squeak has helped a lot to fix the
> public image that Squeak is not dead, but is alive and growing
> in my mind. Thanks News team!
>
>  
>> I'd like to make squeak.org a place where all levels of
>> expertise visit regularly. For old timers, they get the news
>> they want. For those seeking to find out what squeak is about,
>> they see a vibrant community and an aggressive and interesting
>> development of squeak. One way to do that is to build a
>> dynamic presence.  Dynamic news feeds provides a small portion
>> of this. If the site was integrated with an up-to-date, ever
>> changing wiki, that would certainly help people who are
>> looking for technical answers keep coming back. And, it would
>> assist beginners too.
>>    
>
> I agree ;-)
>
>  
>> My belief is that we need a proper mix of 1) news, 2) well
>> trimmed, up-to-date technical information (wiki) and 3) a
>> comprehensive introduction to squeak (which is what the site
>> is right now, but it too needs to be trimmed better.)
>>    
>
> I am working on the trimming. I can help with the mixing.
>
>  
>> Since this is a volunteer organization, and most of us don't
>> have time to build a site that is dynamic as I'm recommending,
>> I suggested feeding the front site with something that was of
>> interest to others and was dynamic. That's all.
>>    
>
> hmm. I just noticed that squeak.org already is a SmallWiki site,
> which is the predecessor to Pier. Would it be possible to just
> upgrade it or flip some bits to turn it into a wiki? I could
> definitely bring some more life into the features and
> Documentation pages, at least.
>
> Also, is there a way I could download the squeak.org SmallWiki
> image? That would help a lot when I get around to examining a
> Swiki emigration.
>
>  
>> Can you or any others help us out?
>>    
>
> Definitely :-)
>  
Welcome :-) I'll try to add you to the password lists etc. (I'm not sure
I remember how to do that...)
Squeak.org and the swiki are different because people wanted a small,
easy intro to the Squeakworld.

As you know the swiki is neither :-) I think it is a nice distinction.

The documentation pages need a lot of attention, so  you are welcome to
work on them.
I don't think we should move all content over to Squeak.org from the
swiki as most users don't have access to squeak.org editing and
therefore editing will be a major obstacle.

The distinction between the doc team and web team would be that there
were some talk about linking the doc into the image somehow. But I
agree, we have much of the same purpose, documenting Squeak.

I'm not sure how well Pier would scale as a wiki. It is quite different
than both Smallwiki and Swiki and it I haven't gotten used to it yet.
Smallwiki is also quite different from Swiki.

I'm not sure how to give you a squeak.org image as it contains passwords
etc. so I can't post it publicly. Access to the server is
provided by the Box admins.

Hope we will have a good time working together.

Karl

12345