Hi all
I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to post, experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so we should learn. Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering the questions on this squeak-starters mailing-list. So if we are 4 or 5 we win! Stef |
I can try to help.
Hilaire stephane ducasse a écrit : > Hi all > > I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters > because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to post, > experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so we > should learn. > > Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering > the questions > on this squeak-starters mailing-list. > > So if we are 4 or 5 we win! > > Stef > > |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Hi Stef,
for german speaking people, there are a lot good souls on the german squeak foundation list ([hidden email]). Many of them seems to be teacher or standing in context of school. The problem is how to connect, because of the language. Regards Hans Am 22.04.2006 um 09:00 schrieb stephane ducasse: > Hi all > > I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters > because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid > to post, > experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so > we should learn. > > Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me > answering the questions > on this squeak-starters mailing-list. > > So if we are 4 or 5 we win! > > Stef > |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Hello Stef,
count me in but don't tack "good soul" on my back. sd> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters sd> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to sd> post, If it's not in french that is :-)) Cheers Herbert mailto:[hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Hilaire Fernandes-5
Dear Good Souls,
I am a newcomer to the world of Squeak and Smalltalk, but already an experienced programmer in some other languages (including Java, which I think I'll never use again :) ) I would like to dive into developing useful applications in Squeak, but don't really know where to start, right now I am trying to familiarize myself with Morphic programming. So, if this collective of Good Souls is together, I'd be the first one to sign up to the new squeak-starters list. Thanks for the great idea - sounds just like what I've been looking for! Attis Hilaire Fernandes írta: > I can try to help. > > Hilaire > > stephane ducasse a écrit : > >>Hi all >> >>I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters >>because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to post, >>experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so we >>should learn. >> >>Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering >>the questions >>on this squeak-starters mailing-list. >> >>So if we are 4 or 5 we win! >> >>Stef >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
stephane ducasse a écrit :
> Hi all > > I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters > because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to > post, > experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so > we should learn. > > Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering > the questions > on this squeak-starters mailing-list. > > So if we are 4 or 5 we win! Hi, I will help alain > > Stef > > > |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Il giorno sab, 22/04/2006 alle 09.00 +0200, stephane ducasse ha scritto:
> Hi all > > I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters > because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to > post, > experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so > we should learn. > > Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering > the questions > on this squeak-starters mailing-list. > > So if we are 4 or 5 we win! > Hi Stef, count me in. I don't really like the name (I'd prefer something like "squeak-users"), but I really like the idea. Giovanni |
In reply to this post by Nagy Attila
Hello Attis,
NA> I am a newcomer to the world of Squeak and Smalltalk, but already an NA> experienced programmer in some other languages (including Java, which I NA> think I'll never use again :) ) I would like to dive into developing NA> useful applications in Squeak, but don't really know where to start, NA> right now I am trying to familiarize myself with Morphic programming. NA> So, if this collective of Good Souls is together, I'd be the first one NA> to sign up to the new squeak-starters list. Thanks for the great idea - NA> sounds just like what I've been looking for! just go ahead, I guess I'm new enough to remember how I felt in the beginning. And my background is like yours. (Except for Java :-) Actually there is a drawback in a newbie list. It splits up the community. The people doing the work of developing Squeak don't stumble about what bugs a newbie anymore. So mail me in private, wait for the new list or just ask here! Cheers Herbert mailto:[hidden email] |
In reply to this post by stephane ducasse
Hello all,
sd> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters sd> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to sd> post, if it is like that, then squeak newbies is necessary but please don't forget (or rethink) the old arguments not to split squeak dev. So maybe us who want to help at least should think about how to deal with this matter. I personally think we should try to direct people here, as soon as they lost their shyness. Herbert mailto:[hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Herbert König
On 22 avr. 06, at 09:46, Herbert König wrote: > Hello Stef, > > > count me in but don't tack "good soul" on my back. Sure ok Black angels then :) > > > sd> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters > sd> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really > afraid to > sd> post, > > If it's not in french that is :-)) I told them that I will give them one extra point on their exam rate if this post email in english :) Stef > > > > Cheers > > Herbert mailto:[hidden email] > > |
In reply to this post by Nagy Attila
Thanks attis
this is the kind of feedback that will kick us in the right direction. For morphic I suggest to have a look at the BreakOut, it summarizes what I learned so far. Not a lot but you can find some examples of drag and drop and others part. Pay attention Morphic is not the coolest part of Squeak and I hope that Tweak will be ready soon. Stef On 22 avr. 06, at 09:49, Nagy Attila wrote: > Dear Good Souls, > > I am a newcomer to the world of Squeak and Smalltalk, but already > an experienced programmer in some other languages (including Java, > which I think I'll never use again :) ) I would like to dive into > developing useful applications in Squeak, but don't really know > where to start, right now I am trying to familiarize myself with > Morphic programming. So, if this collective of Good Souls is > together, I'd be the first one to sign up to the new squeak- > starters list. Thanks for the great idea - sounds just like what > I've been looking for! > > Attis > > Hilaire Fernandes írta: >> I can try to help. >> Hilaire >> stephane ducasse a écrit : >>> Hi all >>> >>> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters >>> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid >>> to post, >>> experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success >>> so we >>> should learn. >>> >>> Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me >>> answering the questions >>> on this squeak-starters mailing-list. >>> >>> So if we are 4 or 5 we win! >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> > > |
In reply to this post by Herbert König
>
> if it is like that, then squeak newbies is necessary but please don't > forget (or rethink) the old arguments not to split squeak dev. Sure but I think that if people can get less fear to ask then we win. > > So maybe us who want to help at least should think about how to deal > with this matter. > > I personally think we should try to direct people here, as soon as > they lost their shyness. Indeed! Stef > > > > Herbert mailto:[hidden email] > > |
In reply to this post by Giovanni Corriga
Giovanni Corriga a écrit :
> Il giorno sab, 22/04/2006 alle 09.00 +0200, stephane ducasse ha scritto: >> Hi all >> >> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters >> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to >> post, >> experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so >> we should learn. >> >> Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering >> the questions >> on this squeak-starters mailing-list. >> >> So if we are 4 or 5 we win! >> > > Hi Stef, > > count me in. I don't really like the name (I'd prefer something like > "squeak-users"), but I really like the idea. +1 for the list name. I'm willing to help. The main problem is a language problem, usually starters prefers to learn in their own speaking language. -- oooo Dr. Serge Stinckwich OOOOOOOO Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD OOESUGOO http://purl.org/net/SergeStinckwich oooooo Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] \ / ## |
In reply to this post by Nagy Attila
Morphic is really cool. I suggest - if not already done - you install
from SqueakMap (world menu, Open...->SqueakMap Package Loader) the "ProgrammingMorph" package. It is an interactive tutorial on some of the Morph programming. When dealing with graphic I have found Morph to be quite fast, and it is globaly pretty cool to programming. I am wondering what is the level of compatibility with Tweak programming? Tweak looks very nice, (but seems slower, why? because of AA?), I also hope to see it soon in stable version of Squeak. Hilaire Nagy Attila a écrit : > Dear Good Souls, > > I am a newcomer to the world of Squeak and Smalltalk, but already an > experienced programmer in some other languages (including Java, which I > think I'll never use again :) ) I would like to dive into developing > useful applications in Squeak, but don't really know where to start, > right now I am trying to familiarize myself with Morphic programming. > So, if this collective of Good Souls is together, I'd be the first one > to sign up to the new squeak-starters list. Thanks for the great idea - > sounds just like what I've been looking for! > > Attis > > Hilaire Fernandes írta: > >> I can try to help. >> >> Hilaire >> >> stephane ducasse a écrit : >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I would like to have a list for newbies: squeak-starters >>> because (I see it now with my students) newbies are really afraid to >>> post, >>> experience with python mailing-list doing the same are a success so we >>> should learn. >>> >>> Now I would like to have a couple of good souls to help me answering >>> the questions >>> on this squeak-starters mailing-list. >>> >>> So if we are 4 or 5 we win! >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Herbert König
Hi Herbert!
Shyness, I think that's quite a barrier to cross when you're new to a community. And when I see people speaking about Croquet and HOM (none of which I have managed to grasp the essence of), indeed I am a bit discouraged to ask questions like "how do I create a simple input window?" Splitting the community wouldn't be much of a problem, I think, as the experienced squeakers can also take part in the new list, which would be for the benefit of both them and the newcomers. As you said: > The people doing the work of developing Squeak don't stumble about > what bugs a newbie anymore. Exactly that's what I think. And I think that is why there aren't enough good tutorials out there. And again, I think the splitting of the community would not be that much of a problem, if the new list would be successful at levelling up the newcomers to the point where they are able to take part in the main dev list's discussions. Herbert König írta: > Hello Attis, > > NA> I am a newcomer to the world of Squeak and Smalltalk, but already an > NA> experienced programmer in some other languages (including Java, which I > NA> think I'll never use again :) ) I would like to dive into developing > NA> useful applications in Squeak, but don't really know where to start, > NA> right now I am trying to familiarize myself with Morphic programming. > NA> So, if this collective of Good Souls is together, I'd be the first one > NA> to sign up to the new squeak-starters list. Thanks for the great idea - > NA> sounds just like what I've been looking for! > > just go ahead, I guess I'm new enough to remember how I felt in the > beginning. And my background is like yours. (Except for Java :-) > > Actually there is a drawback in a newbie list. It splits up the > community. > > The people doing the work of developing Squeak don't stumble about > what bugs a newbie anymore. > > So mail me in private, wait for the new list or just ask here! > > > Cheers > > Herbert mailto:[hidden email] > > > |
Hi Squeakers,
I've been trying to install some packages I think may be of help in learning Morphic (BreakOut, ProgrammingMorph, LifeMorph), of which only BreakOut installed correctly. I keep getting errors saying that there's no release for my Squeak version, which is 3.8. Most packages are for 3.6. Should I downgrade my Squeak? Or is there another way? Thanks, Attis |
Nagy Attila a écrit : > Hi Squeakers, > > I've been trying to install some packages I think may be of help in > learning Morphic (BreakOut, ProgrammingMorph, LifeMorph), of which only > BreakOut installed correctly. I keep getting errors saying that there's > no release for my Squeak version, which is 3.8. Most packages are for > 3.6. Should I downgrade my Squeak? Or is there another way? Even if you get this message, you can still ask to get the package installed. At least I know it works for ProgrammingMorph. > > Thanks, Attis > > |
What I get is:
"Error occured during install: MultiByteFileStream>>fileInObjectAndCodeForProject" Debugger says "MultiByteFileStrem(Object) does not understand #fileInObjectAndCodeForProject" Can this be due to the version mismatch? Hilaire Fernandes írta: > > Nagy Attila a écrit : > >>Hi Squeakers, >> >>I've been trying to install some packages I think may be of help in >>learning Morphic (BreakOut, ProgrammingMorph, LifeMorph), of which only >>BreakOut installed correctly. I keep getting errors saying that there's >>no release for my Squeak version, which is 3.8. Most packages are for >>3.6. Should I downgrade my Squeak? Or is there another way? > > > Even if you get this message, you can still ask to get the package > installed. At least I know it works for ProgrammingMorph. > > > >>Thanks, Attis >> >> > > > |
Hi!
Nagy Attila <[hidden email]> wrote: > What I get is: > > "Error occured during install: > MultiByteFileStream>>fileInObjectAndCodeForProject" > > Debugger says "MultiByteFileStrem(Object) does not understand > #fileInObjectAndCodeForProject" > > Can this be due to the version mismatch? Mmm, that is when installing using SM right? I think it looks like an SM bug caused by changes in 3.8. Chech senders and implementors of #fileInObjectAndCodeForProject - the problem is most probably caused by the 3.8 related m17n changes (but we just have to live with that - I really, really like the work Yoshiki put into it :) ). I can take a quick look tonight I think, gotta try to make SM Croquet-clean anyway, and other issues. regards, Göran |
In reply to this post by Nagy Attila
Oops I should update the map.
Normally it worked well in 3.8 :) Stef On 22 avr. 06, at 11:34, Nagy Attila wrote: > Hi Squeakers, > > I've been trying to install some packages I think may be of help in > learning Morphic (BreakOut, ProgrammingMorph, LifeMorph), of which > only BreakOut installed correctly. I keep getting errors saying > that there's no release for my Squeak version, which is 3.8. Most > packages are for 3.6. Should I downgrade my Squeak? Or is there > another way? > > Thanks, Attis > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |